Shaolin 4123V4

First I have to say this tactics is not mine, its created from the highly rated StephenHK. It's a 4123 formation with PF and two wingers. He describes it like Offense and Defensive - Stable with high win rate.

On FM-BASE its rated 1st on their tests, no tactics came close. So I thought I posted it here for testing.









[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuSlQe-cBOY&ab_channel=FMDNA[/youtube]

@DeviAngel, it's been tested already - https://fm-arena.com/tactic/2553-stephenhk-shaolin-4123v4/

Solaris said: @DeviAngel, it's been tested already - https://fm-arena.com/tactic/2553-stephenhk-shaolin-4123v4/ Expand

I'm sorry I'm a fool :lol:

BTtw do you know why some tactics have a different grade on different forums ?

DeviAngel said: BTtw do you know why some tactics have a different grade on different forums ? Expand

Because testing tactics isn't a simple thing to do and if it was a simple thing to do then everyone easily could do that and what's mostly important everyone would get the same result but as you can see many people and different sites test tactics and they all get different results, sometimes their results are quite similar and sometimes are very different.

The methodology of testing determines the quality of testing. Different tactics testing sources use different methodology some of them test without FMRTE and some of them test only 38 matches thinking it's enough and so on... that's why everyone gets different results.

DeviAngel said: I'm sorry I'm a fool :lol:

BTtw do you know why some tactics have a different grade on different forums ? Expand

Different methodologies get different results. If you get a tactic and try it in England, it might have a different result than trying it in Sweden, Brazil or China, because they have different teams, squads and tactics.

For example, Premier League has many managers that use 4231, meaning tactics effective against this formation will have higher score. It also means some teams have more players available to certain positions, making tactics that use those positions more effective.

Those are just a few examples, but there are many other things that can affect results. A testing league that has good players for all positions, resets injuries, freezes players, blocks firing managers and resets physical status like condition and fatigue will be more consistent and favour more intense tactics, while testing leagues that don't do those things will favour more the teams with balanced squads instead of focusing on evaluating exclusively the quality of a tactic (standard holiday testing usually fall into this category).

Anyway, tests are just methods to calculate some sort of metric and allow test subjects to be compared. You can't compare meters with feet, yards or other of those primitive metrics, because they use different methods of calculation. It's even further if you go from meters to grams, which is what usually happens between two different testing leagues.

@ZaZ @Solaris

I agree also thank you for the information and the explanation. I find that FM-ARENA tested tactics always give me best results