Delicious said: It should works with SS as well, i wanted an option that was minimize the impact on the tactic at all but to give something back and .-. As you see on 4141 is working better because there are actually 2 SS. But if you don't have low wings i guess it's still a bit useless Expand
Wonder if u have tried IWB with IF/IW with stay wide PI... did u?
crizeKOS said: Wonder if u have tried IWB with IF/IW with stay wide PI... did u? Expand
i was going next to it but iwb is doing under perfoming on 4231, i tried iwb/iw on balance,but not on offensive i mean i tried them 100% but at the time my personal test didn't were acceptable. Gonna test it later
Delicious said: i was going next to it but iwb is doing under perfoming on 4231, i tried iwb/iw on balance,but not on offensive i mean i tried them 100% but at the time my personal test didn't were acceptable. Gonna test it later Expand
i've tried all of them :P, from my test AM it's better then SS but here not even near or maybe at the time i did with wrong setup. But imho AM can add something on the calderon. Trequartista and regista are perfoming well "itself",but not optimal, they really might need a specific build in order to release their pontential.
I mean if i have to release all my "experiments"... Zippo is going to block ip me..
Delicious said: i've tried all of them :P, from my test AM it's better then SS but here not even near or maybe at the time i did with wrong setup. But imho AM can add something on the calderon. Trequartista and regista are perfoming well "itself",but not optimal, they really might need a specific build in order to release their pontential.
I mean if i have to release all my "experiments"... Zippo is going to block ip me.. Expand
yeah, we get in a moment that just little experiments can make a tactic improve.
Spoiler
The change is about just putting into consideration every test were made and basically now i am putting logic over the game it self(i know it sound crazy) 4231 positive,is just based on my thoughts,but if same tactic on positive is 53 focus play down on, but there is no "stuck-in" now the real question would be what's the total point if we put the same tactic but on positive? (We don't know, but we can supposed or is 53 around 54,because if we check 4231 Nurmagomedov it did score 53 and we added : Overlap;Run at Defence; and Focus play down... So we can say after all of this we can say that something is giving -1 (for me run at defence is -1) Now the question is about overlap and focus play down... But we know from the bible that overlap is doing "negative" impact then positive but we don't know "how much" , the only thing we don't know if that focus play down is really doing something or not.. So i am just guessing that to put FPD is a better bet,maybe is doing nothing for real or it's giving -1 let's see..
Delicious said: It should works with SS as well, i wanted an option that was minimize the impact on the tactic at all but to give something back and .-.
As you see on 4141 is working better because there are actually 2 SS. But if you don't have low wings i guess it's still a bit useless
Wonder if u have tried IWB with IF/IW with stay wide PI... did u?
crizeKOS said: Wonder if u have tried IWB with IF/IW with stay wide PI... did u?
i was going next to it but iwb is doing under perfoming on 4231, i tried iwb/iw on balance,but not on offensive i mean i tried them 100% but at the time my personal test didn't were acceptable.
Gonna test it later
Delicious said: i was going next to it but iwb is doing under perfoming on 4231, i tried iwb/iw on balance,but not on offensive i mean i tried them 100% but at the time my personal test didn't were acceptable.
Gonna test it later
Did u ever tried TREQ in SS place?
crizeKOS said: Did u ever tried TREQ in SS place?
i've tried all of them :P, from my test AM it's better then SS but here not even near or maybe at the time i did with wrong setup. But imho AM can add something on the calderon. Trequartista and regista are perfoming well "itself",but not optimal, they really might need a specific build in order to release their pontential.
I mean if i have to release all my "experiments"... Zippo is going to block ip me..
Delicious said: i've tried all of them :P, from my test AM it's better then SS but here not even near or maybe at the time i did with wrong setup. But imho AM can add something on the calderon. Trequartista and regista are perfoming well "itself",but not optimal, they really might need a specific build in order to release their pontential.
I mean if i have to release all my "experiments"... Zippo is going to block ip me..
yeah, we get in a moment that just little experiments can make a tactic improve.
Index
4231 Khabib Nurmagomedov
Changelog:
Spoiler The change is about just putting into consideration every test were made and basically now i am putting logic over the game it self(i know it sound crazy) 4231 positive,is just based on my thoughts,but if same tactic on positive is 53 focus play down on, but there is no "stuck-in" now the real question would be what's the total point if we put the same tactic but on positive? (We don't know, but we can supposed or is 53 around 54,because if we check 4231 Nurmagomedov it did score 53 and we added : Overlap;Run at Defence; and Focus play down...
So we can say after all of this we can say that something is giving -1 (for me run at defence is -1)
Now the question is about overlap and focus play down... But we know from the bible that overlap is doing "negative" impact then positive but we don't know "how much" , the only thing we don't know if that focus play down is really doing something or not..
So i am just guessing that to put FPD is a better bet,maybe is doing nothing for real or it's giving -1 let's see..