|
Uploaded Date
|
Downloads
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mar 8, 2023
|
189
|
latest patchPatch 23.5.0 ( N )
not tested yet
Patch 23.5.0
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
60.9
+14
66
52
1,920
Matches
Patch 23.5.0 tests
Test #1
Date: 09.03.2023
Test #2
Date: 09.03.2023
Test #3
Date: 09.03.2023
Test #4
Date: 09.03.2023
Test #5
Date: 09.03.2023
Test #6
Date: 09.03.2023
Create an account or log in to leave a comment
Using both overlaps and underlaps in the same formation. Not sure if this will work but worth a shot.
Nice to see different roles and duties at every position, except for the double AF of course
. Any luck with a supporting striker like DLF or F9?
I use the same setup just with IWB instead of FB. Is the consensus that FB with play narrow and run inside just works better than IWB?
TommyToxic said: I use the same setup just with IWB instead of FB. Is the consensus that FB with play narrow and run inside just works better than IWB?
In this setup(where both DM slots are occupied) FBs that have the same PIs as IWBs would work 99% the same.
Zippo said: In this setup(where both DM slots are occupied) FBs that have the same PIs as IWBs would work 99% the same.
dunno why, but FB with cut inside doesn't move properly in undlerlaps, tending to stay on the flank until last third of the pitch
IWB does them right from the central line even with double DMs
p.s. or mb the problem is I don't watch highlights on comprehensive and just miss when FB does them too
TargetPerson said: Nice to see different roles and duties at every position, except for the double AF of course
. Any luck with a supporting striker like DLF or F9?
I have had luck with using a pressing forward (support) in tactics. It might not be "optimal" but I think replacing the left striker with PF-S would still work for this tactic. I have not done much testing with DLFs or F9s.