Author
Uploaded Date
Downloads
Mar 16, 2023
124
latest patchPatch 23.5.0 ( N )
not tested yet
Patch 23.5.0
ok
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
50.6
-3
65
68
640
Matches
Patch 23.5.0 tests
click to hide
Test #1
Date: 16.03.2023
Test #2
Date: 16.03.2023

3322 formation with double AP, double WCB and attacking mentality. Otherwise standard

0

TommyToxic said: Description

I don't find any? :)

0

Droid said: I don't find any? :)

Not much to say, more or less the same instructions as everyone else has, just with attacking mentality double AP and WCB

0

TommyToxic said: Not much to say, more or less the same instructions as everyone else has, just with attacking mentality double AP and WCB

Then please put that in the description.

Or if there's nothing special in your tactic then what is the point in testing it? :)

0

Droid said: Then please put that in the description.

Or if there's nothing special in your tactic then what is the point in testing it? :)


Because tbf most of the tactics posted here are just the same tactic with a few tweaks so it just seems superfluous to write anything unless you create something very different from whats already here.

0

TommyToxic said: Because tbf most of the tactics posted here are just the same tactic with a few tweaks so it just seems superfluous to write anything unless you create something very different from whats already here.

If follow your logic then there's also no point in testing a tactic until it offers something very different from whats already here.

If you don't believe your tactic brings anything new and you don't believe it's capable of moving the progress forward then what's the point in offering it for the testing? :blink:

0

Droid said: If follow your logic then there's also no point in testing a tactic until it offers something very different from whats already here.

If you don't believe your tactic brings anything new and you don't believe it's capable of moving the progress forward then what's the point in offering it for the testing? :blink:


You are not following my logic. I'm writing about reasons for writing a description, you are writing about reasons for testing. The two are different obviously, as small changes can have an impact on the results. I respect the rules so I've added what I wrote earlier to the description as you requested. Having tactics tested is a great service so I don't mean to be disrespectful.

0

TommyToxic said: You are not following my logic. I'm writing about reasons for writing a description, you are writing about reasons for testing. The two are different obviously, as small changes can have an impact on the results. I respect the rules so I've added what I wrote earlier to the description as you requested. Having tactics tested is a great service so I don't mean to be disrespectful.

Just to be clear here, if you read this - https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/

then you learn that the decision about whether to test a tactic or not is based on the tactic representation which must consist of a description and screenshots to backup your tactic.

When you put "." or "description" or "oohhh there's nothing to say" as the description then it looks quite disrespectful and in this case don't be surprised to see your tactics being ignored.

Of course, it's up to you to decide what to do... I'm just saying...

0

Droid said: Just to be clear here, if you read this - https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/

then you learn that the decision about whether to test a tactic or not is based on the tactic representation which must consist of a description and screenshots to backup your tactic.

When you put "." or "description" or "oohhh there's nothing to say" as the description then it looks quite disrespectful and in this case don't be surprised to see your tactics being ignored.

Of course, it's up to you to decide what to do... I'm just saying...


Point taken.

1
Create an account or log in to leave a comment