|
Uploaded Date
|
Downloads
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Oct 23, 2023
|
53
|
latest patchPatch 24.4.0 (DB3.0)
not tested yet
Patch 24.0.1 (DB1.0)
Patch 24.0.1 (DB1.0) tests
Test #1
Date: 24.10.2023
Test #2
Date: 24.10.2023
Test #3
Date: 24.10.2023
Create an account or log in to leave a comment
Well the 3 ATB and high line appears to be doing rather well. Here is another test of that (Luton Town were also involved in this test)
I am curious to see the results on this one. In my observation, IW (A) doesn't score a lot of goals as IF (A), that's why the GS is only around 100 ish with Man. City. New variations of the tactics are always fun.
sponsorkindest said: I am curious to see the results on this one. In my observation, IW (A) doesn't score a lot of goals as IF (A), that's why the GS is only around 100 ish with Man. City. New variations of the tactics are always fun.
In theory the IW is a more creative role than the IF, therefore shouldn't score as many. In previous years that was true, last year I found that the IF wasn't as good as the IW in just about every aspect. I think it depends more the type of player than the role itself. For instance, Bernardo Silva at IW will score a few but mostly get a bag of assists, Mbappe as IW will get lots of goals but only a few assists
Steelwood said: In theory the IW is a more creative role than the IF, therefore shouldn't score as many. In previous years that was true, last year I found that the IF wasn't as good as the IW in just about every aspect. I think it depends more the type of player than the role itself. For instance, Bernardo Silva at IW will score a few but mostly get a bag of assists, Mbappe as IW will get lots of goals but only a few assists
Ya last year IF was so bad, this year so far looks good. Let's see the results between the two tactics would tell which looks better this year. Cheers!