4123 keep pace III

Compare with II
MCR: AP(A)→MEZ(A)
The right: Overlap→Underlap

It seems to work well.

Can this be ran with Cross more often on the wing backs, they seem to get into some nice positions but don't cross.

Smigo08 said: Can this be ran with Cross more often on the wing backs, they seem to get into some nice positions but don't cross. Expand

Absolutely, in fact, many of the minor details set up in the tactical test result are not even as significant as the randomness of the test itself. But if you're playing on your own, these small changes can have a real impact depending on the attributes of your players.

damn, offensive tactics took a hit, it feels like though there was nothing called out in the patch notes

sponsorkindest said: damn, offensive tactics took a hit, it feels like though there was nothing called out in the patch notes Expand
SI might fixed defence that's why

sponsorkindest said: damn, offensive tactics took a hit, it feels like though there was nothing called out in the patch notes Expand

I was sure there was a voice saying : Reduced  "goal scoring overall", now can't find it anymore, from that seem they have just fixed AI behavior on defending phase. Which is the case, is totaly dumb.

Now that i am reading more, there are MANY voices that got changed from the first "patch note", pretty sure there was something even about ball deflection etc. Didn't know they would alterate it, or i would've made a SS ...

I was sure they nerfed the overall goal scoring output (AI/Player).

dzek said: SI might fixed defence that's why Expand

good point!

Delicious said: I was sure there was a voice saying : Reduced  "goal scoring overall", now can't find it anymore, from that seem they have just fixed AI behavior on defending phase. Which is the case, is totaly dumb.

Now that i am reading more, there are MANY voices that got changed from the first "patch note", pretty sure there was something even about ball deflection etc. Didn't know they would alterate it, or i would've made a SS ...

I was sure they nerfed the overall goal scoring output (AI/Player). Expand

I thought I was hallucinating, I swear I read something like that (something around attacking behaviour) on the patch note within an hour the patch came out but I couldn't find that after.

Delicious said: I was sure there was a voice saying : Reduced  "goal scoring overall", now can't find it anymore, from that seem they have just fixed AI behavior on defending phase. Which is the case, is totaly dumb.

Now that i am reading more, there are MANY voices that got changed from the first "patch note", pretty sure there was something even about ball deflection etc. Didn't know they would alterate it, or i would've made a SS ...

I was sure they nerfed the overall goal scoring output (AI/Player). Expand

An admin from them in the general thread replied to me that no attacking movement and stuff like that has been altered even under the hood, because i mostly asked about movement and ME more general stuff, there was a fix for defending in own area for crosses something like that this "Fixes for too many defenders going for a header inside own area" but i  think this also implies for set pieces maybe dunno

sponsorkindest said: I thought I was hallucinating, I swear I read something like that (something around attacking behaviour) on the patch note within an hour the patch came out but I couldn't find that after. Expand

There were posts of the admins which had simulated and went from 3.15 to 2.8 goals average in tests as very close to real life simulation so maybe is that, so goals are reduced as confirmed by them but dunno how it is done if no ME open play stuff have been added.

Avenger22 said: An admin from them in the general thread replied to me that no attacking movement and stuff like that has been altered even under the hood, because i mostly asked about movement and ME more general stuff, there was a fix for defending in own area for crosses something like that Expand

As even sponsor said, i was like, did i smoke something different or something ain't quite right here... But still isn't very professional to change your patch "sneaky sneaky" like that..

Delicious said: As even sponsor said, i was like, did i smoke something different or something ain't quite right here... But still isn't very professional to change your patch "sneaky sneaky" like that.. Expand

It is in the patch note the fix for defending headers in own area, apart from that nothing ME open play, but they have confirmed reducing goals from many tests but curious how can you reduce from 3.15 to 2.8 goals average without ME open play fixes maybe set pieces which are huge in FM in terms of goals may have been toned down so it is bit better zero idea tbf

Avenger22 said: It is in the patch note the fix for defending headers in own area, apart from that nothing ME open play, but they have confirmed reducing goals from many tests but curious how can you reduce from 3.15 to 2.8 goals average without ME open play fixes maybe set pieces which are huge in FM in terms of goals may have been toned down so it is bit better zero idea tbf Expand

That was pre-patch with Pio-Terminator, i am using a control-possession based on de Zerbi, even tho they quite made mission impossible to recreate now the build-up. He did like 45 goals from corners on 2nd season.





I already found a new way for corners to score at least 20+ goals but what's strange are the min. and max that are going between 25 to 37. Literally their "hotfix" was this :



The image speak it self, i don't know if that's normal or people will start to understand what i mean by i can't expect less than this