Author
Uploaded Date
Downloads
Dec 8, 2023
29
latest patchPatch 24.4.0
not tested yet
Patch 24.2.0 (v1.0)
ok
55.6
47.6
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
51.6
0
56
56
1,200
Matches
Patch 24.2.0 (v1.0) tests
click to hide
Test #1
Date: 08.12.2023
Test #2
Date: 08.12.2023
Test #3
Date: 08.12.2023

Still trying to make this tactical setup (3241) more efficient... And it's not easy.
Here's a new attempt, 5th version of my boom tactic. I can't say that this version is better than the others, only the test will tell.
Can you test this tactic please?

0

52 great. It's the best 3241 so far. It just goes to show that you have to persevere. I'm going to keep thinking about how to keep improving this tactic... If you have any ideas?

0

Filer974 said: 52 great. It's the best 3241 so far. It just goes to show that you have to persevere. I'm going to keep thinking about how to keep improving this tactic... If you have any ideas?
To be honest if you want to achieve this shape when your team has the ball you can play like this but be aware that what you see there, it's the out of possession shape and its very leaky in defence from wider areas of the pitch because you don't use normal FBs.

So i think it's better to use a 433 out of possession(what you on tactics panel) and transform it into 3241 in possession(with specific roles).

1

Something like this. @Filer974

1

dzek said: Something like this. @Filer974


Thank you for your help. You're probably right, I'll check it out

0

Filer974 said: Thank you for your help. You're probably right, I'll check it out
This is just an example. You have to build it to work as it should.

1

In game example with 433 shape transform into 3241.

4-3-3 (Out of Possession)


3-2-4-1 (In Possession)

1

In game example with 4231 shape transform into 3241.

4-2-3-1 (Out of Possession)


3-2-4-1 (In Possession)

1

dzek said: In game example with 4231 shape transform into 3241.

4-2-3-1 (Out of Possession)


3-2-4-1 (In Possession)


I think IFB doesn't have dribble more PI which i think affects alot in meta stuff dunno why they and the WCB(d) made it impossible to set it makes no sense, i mean i want an IFB but i want to mould it to be also line breaker not just backpasser, also interesting the IW i also like it much more than wingers which stay wide and sleep on the sideline rarely making a run inside or behind useless

1
Create an account or log in to leave a comment