4231 Hegemony (through) - Dzek Tweak

A tweak version of 4231 Hegemony (through) created by @A Smile.

Mentality
Attacking  -->  Positive

TIs
Added: Distribute To Centre-Backs, Slow Pace Down
Removed: Focus Play Down Both Flanks, Distribute Quickly, Get Stuck In, Step Up More

PIs
Removed 'Shoot Less Often' from WBs and 'Tackle Harder' from GK.




PLAYER INSTRUCTIONS

Finally, a 4-2-3-1 tactical.

Werrun said: Finally, a 4-2-3-1 tactical. Expand
Erik, is that you? GGMU

PI please i play on FMT, do u use OI?

dzek said: Erik, is that you? GGMU Expand

Shhhh. Keep quiet please. I come here to download your tactical to imporve my team this week. Don't let Bournemouth known about it.

Gj dzek!

anyone PI please helpp

Good job!Can you keep trying the underlap? I've tested many different variations myself before, and even without changing any of the other instructions, the holiday test results are just as strong. It's amazing, and it doesn't make sense... The combination of duties in the 4231 formation is so strong that I don't think the comparison of the test results of these different offensive sets even 4,000 games can be truly accurate.

A Smile said: Good job!Can you keep trying the underlap? I've tested many different variations myself before, and even without changing any of the other instructions, the holiday test results are just as strong. It's amazing, and it doesn't make sense... The combination of duties in the 4231 formation is so strong that I don't think the comparison of the test results of these different offensive sets even 4,000 games can be truly accurate. Expand
I have already test underlaps in any possible way in terms of TIs and it seems that they decrease the score. It has to do with formation and roles. I agree with the rest

I tested it here for 5 games and liked what I saw. The tactic better controls the game and ball possession. Some simple victories, but without suffering, and other easy victories.

The biggest highlight is that the tactic is not 100% intensity. This means that in the long term in a league there is less wear and tear on players without loss of points and income.

Let's see how it goes with 2400 games

Eddie said: I tested it here for 5 games and liked what I saw. The tactic better controls the game and ball possession. Some simple victories, but without suffering, and other easy victories.

The biggest highlight is that the tactic is not 100% intensity. This means that in the long term in a league there is less wear and tear on players without loss of points and income. Expand
That's exactly what I wanted to do. Thanks for the confirmation!

Eddie said: Let's see how it goes with 2400 games Expand
I don't think it will last but what you say above confirms that I have fulfilled my goal.
  - Better control the game / Ball Possession
  - "Low" intensity tactic for the long run of a normal season

dzek said: I have already test underlaps in any possible way in terms of TIs and it seems that they decrease the score. It has to do with formation and roles. I agree with the rest Expand

Let me try

A Smile said: Let me try Expand
Go on!!

anyone can give me player instruction, i desperate trying this tactic

dzek said: Go on!! Expand

boss pls give me ur PI

gohan said: anyone can give me player instruction, i desperate trying this tactic Expand
gohan said: boss pls give me ur PI Expand
Check the OP.

hi guy, first post here

nice to find a tactic with less intensity, do you tried with balanced mentality ?

chakalfm said: hi guy, first post here

nice to find a tactic with less intensity, do you tried with balanced mentality ? Expand
Hi,

No I didn't and I don't know if there will be a change in terms of the score here at FM-Arena. You can always change it to Balanced when you want to maintain a lead or relax your players

GK Instructions?

impersonal2556 said: GK Instructions? Expand
No instructions

Enjoying this so far, 2nd season I am moving from a 4-3-3 and this 4-2-3-1 plays nice football, is there any room for experimenting with the CDM roles?

Peter78 said: Enjoying this so far, 2nd season I am moving from a 4-3-3 and this 4-2-3-1 plays nice football, is there any room for experimenting with the CDM roles? Expand
I'm glad to hear that

You could do the following:
Aggressive approach:
Change one of the two to VOL(Su).

Defensive approach:
Change one of the two to DLP(Su). He'll help more with possession of the ball with more passes but may make a few turnovers. Also he holds his position better than the DM role defensively.

So far that's all.

cheers i'll have a look at making those changes