Author
Uploaded Date
Downloads
Dec 9, 2023
2,655
latest patchPatch 24.4.0
not tested yet
Patch 24.2.0 (v2.0)
excellent
62.8
54.8
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
58.8
+12
59
47
1,200
Matches
Patch 24.2.0 (v1.0)
excellent
63.4
58.6
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
61.0
+15
61
46
4,000
Matches
Patch 24.2.0 (v2.0) tests
click to hide
Test #1
Date: 12.01.2024
Test #2
Date: 12.01.2024
Test #3
Date: 12.01.2024
Patch 24.2.0 (v1.0) tests
click to show

Final one for a while
-Combining overlaps with MHDL and step up more

7

Welcome back

1

BOOM! Is this a 3-2-5 attacking shape? It looks awesome, congrats man!

1

hahaha, GJ!!!

4

wow! This formation really deserves a better position. I have compared the effect of IFS and SS through 424 deformation and 4231 deformation test and online competition during the holiday, and IFS is obviously better. So, it should be better than 424 deformation II.

1

:devil:

1

This is certainly unique. Congrats

1

I think I got a lucky RNG roll. Probably around 60-61 at best.


juwow said: BOOM! Is this a 3-2-5 attacking shape? It looks awesome, congrats man!

More of a 442 while defending and a 343 in transition/attack


A Smile said: wow! This formation really deserves a better position. I have compared the effect of IFS and SS through 424 deformation and 4231 deformation test and online competition during the holiday, and IFS is obviously better. So, it should be better than 424 deformation II.

Feel free to try it with a IF-S

1

Hey, love the look of this. Please can you post the Player instructions and I will give it a try. Thanks

0

Blau said: I think I got a lucky RNG roll. Probably around 60-61 at best.




More of a 442 while defending and a 343 in transition/attack




Feel free to try it with a IF-S


What I mean is the difference between AML and AMCL.:) This strategy looks great from the player's duties and position, even if the final score will drop a bit does not prevent it from being excellent.

0

Dallas said: Hey, love the look of this. Please can you post the Player instructions and I will give it a try. Thanks

All roles have tackle harder

IF- Sit Narrower
DW- Take More Risks, Cross From Byline
VOL- Move Into Channels, Take More Risks
WB- Take More Risks, Dribble more, Run Wide With Ball, Shoot Less Often, Stay Wider
BPD- Dribble More

0

Blau said: All roles have tackle harder

IF- Sit Narrower
DW- Take More Risks, Cross From Byline
VOL- Move Into Channels, Take More Risks
WB- Take More Risks, Dribble more, Run Wide With Ball, Shoot Less Often, Stay Wider
BPD- Dribble More


Brill thank you

1

Blau said: I think I got a lucky RNG roll. Probably around 60-61 at best.




More of a 442 while defending and a 343 in transition/attack




Feel free to try it with a IF-S


I think 60 points is enough to open up new possibilities. Deploying two defensive midfielders and how to deploy the remaining four positions is what the back four is currently all about, but using VOL-At again instead of DM-Su could bring about change again.

2

That's the essence of IFBD, you're opening up a new channel that's only available in FM24.

2

is it possible to have the reverse version?

0

1

What a set piece do you recomended??

0

Sorry to say, tested this twice on holiday mode and did not see even close to the results other have, ranked only 63rd out of 67 tactics I've personally tested, don't understand how this has scored so well in the FM Arena tests, have never seen my own results differ from the ones here so drastically

0

Great tactic!

Thanks, @Blau.

I easily won EPL and UEFA Europe League with Liverpool.

I got only 1 lose in the league during the season.



0

This one will be tested till 4000 one day?

0

Unless they've changed the players, i think this might be slightly better than expected since the tactic tester teams have no players fitted to be good Defensive Wingers.

0

Can this tactic be added to the queue to be retested in v2? Thanks

0
Create an account or log in to leave a comment