|
Uploaded Date
|
Downloads
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Dec 31, 2023
|
10
|
latest patchPatch 24.4.0
not tested yet
Patch 24.2.0 (v1.0)
Patch 24.2.0 (v1.0) tests
Test #1
Date: 31.12.2023
Test #2
Date: 31.12.2023
Test #3
Date: 31.12.2023
Create an account or log in to leave a comment
This tactic owes a lot to the RedGen tactic by @CSTG KANE. I thought I would try and transform it into a 343 asymmetrical tactic. Unfortunately I forgot to change the name so it still says 424.
I moved one of the ST back to AM Att, the right winger back to MR IW Sup and the left back up to WB WB Att. To cover for the loss of a defender I placed one of the DMs to DM Def in the hope that he would cover when the WB went forward. I changed the other DM to Vol Su to try and get more attacking chances.
I used my normal testing teams. Highlights were Man City going close to winning everything and scoring 117 goals and 103 points. Missed out on CL by going down to PSG in the semi.
Even Bromley scored 132 goals and 111 points in the VNL.
Defensively seemed ok as well but not as good as RedGeneral.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Man City
Bromley
Mark said: This tactic owes a lot to the RedGen tactic by @CSTG KANE. I thought I would try and transform it into a 343 asymmetrical tactic. Unfortunately I forgot to change the name so it still says 424.
I moved one of the ST back to AM Att, the right winger back to MR IW Sup and the left back up to WB WB Att. To cover for the loss of a defender I placed one of the DMs to DM Def in the hope that he would cover when the WB went forward. I changed the other DM to Vol Su to try and get more attacking chances.
I used my normal testing teams. Highlights were Man City going close to winning everything and scoring 117 goals and 103 points. Missed out on CL by going down to PSG in the semi.
Even Bromley scored 132 goals and 111 points in the VNL.
Defensively seemed ok as well but not as good as RedGeneral.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Man City
Bromley
I'm glad to see that my thoughts have inspired you, that's exactly what I want to do, and it's a great feeling to be inspired, even though I'm now a "prisoner". But I'm still creating new tactics, and posts like yours definitely give me a lot of motivation, thank you and Happy New Year!
For this formation idea, I was trying to play with the IFB, my idea was to have the IFB on one side for control and have the WB on the other side for forward pressure, my takeaway is to use a side on one side of the IFB for the tackle, and then the midfielder on the same side can be set up for aggressive duty (I used VOL), and on the other side to use defensive duty to protect the WB's backside, and for the frontcourt duty on the WB's side, he's supposed to be biased towards the center of the field for attacking, and this is conducive to providing the WB with space
CSTG KANE said: I'm glad to see that my thoughts have inspired you, that's exactly what I want to do, and it's a great feeling to be inspired, even though I'm now a "prisoner". But I'm still creating new tactics, and posts like yours definitely give me a lot of motivation, thank you and Happy New Year!
Come on mate, you're not a "prisoner". I'm a fan of your work but unfortunately you messed up by putting the same screenshots on your uploads. You've been asked to rectify the issue that's all. If you don't have the screenshots then download the tactic and run a test with it then upload them screenshots
CBP87 said: Come on mate, you're not a "prisoner". I'm a fan of your work but unfortunately you messed up by putting the same screenshots on your uploads. You've been asked to rectify the issue that's all. If you don't have the screenshots then download the tactic and run a test with it then upload them screenshots
Dude, I was just kidding
I've been modding and uploading different screenshots already