FB PIs are quite different, so probably they average the same score but interaction between TIs like Overlaps/Underlaps (that mostly impact Wbs/Fbs) and PIs are different, but who knows
Can't really know that it makes no difference from this kind of testing. You would have to see if it performs different with overlaps/underlaps against spesific tactics/formations. Might just be that overlaps and underlaps performs better/worse against different type of formations, and it all equals out to 63 points in the end.
Hey,
There are almost 3 identical tactics:
( 63pts ) 4231 Hegemony (through) underlap - https://fm-arena.com/thread/7721-4231-hegemony-through-underlap/
( 63pts ) 4231 Pirate 3.1 - https://fm-arena.com/thread/8661-4231-pirate-3-1/
( 63pts ) Katana 4231 101p v1.3 - https://fm-arena.com/thread/8594-katana-4231-101p-v1-3/
One have "Overlaps", one have "Underlaps" and one have "none" and they all scored 63 pts after 4,000 matches.
I just don't understand SI logic why they put in the game TIs that don't make any difference? What is the point?
What do you think?
FB PIs are quite different, so probably they average the same score but interaction between TIs like Overlaps/Underlaps (that mostly impact Wbs/Fbs) and PIs are different, but who knows
Can't really know that it makes no difference from this kind of testing. You would have to see if it performs different with overlaps/underlaps against spesific tactics/formations. Might just be that overlaps and underlaps performs better/worse against different type of formations, and it all equals out to 63 points in the end.