424 Classic v.10

Removing Hold Up from IF

PI for console please thank you

normal1 said: PI for console please thank you Expand

Grimlock said: Expand

so kind thank u

No offense to the creator, but to me, this is no new tactic. Especially not the new no1 Listing. If it provided any better results it would work for me. But one thing changed to no1 with no effect at all shouldn´t even be listed in my honest opinion. @FM Arena

bwig said: No offense to the creator, but to me, this is no new tactic. Especially not the new no1 Listing. If it provided any better results it would work for me. But one thing changed to no1 with no effect at all shouldn´t even be listed in my honest opinion. @FM Arena Expand

Hi, dont'worry ahah, i just applied CF(S) + IF(A) from A Smile's tactic to previous versions of 424 Classic, with FBs, TakeMoreRisks on AF, etc... By the way i'm just trying to find out the best possible tactic, and by now 424 looks most promising way, so tweaking small PI/TIs is the only thing i can think to discover something better, i decided to invest my two daily uploads to explore this path, and it's normal that with the 9600 games accuracy some tactics show same results, but how can we know it before testing them?

Gianaa9 said: Hi, dont'worry ahah, i just applied CF(S) + IF(A) from A Smile's tactic to previous versions of 424 Classic, with FBs, TakeMoreRisks on AF, etc... By the way i'm just trying to find out the best possible tactic, and by now 424 looks most promising way, so tweaking small PI/TIs is the only thing i can think to discover something better, i decided to invest my two daily uploads to explore this path, and it's normal that with the 9600 games accuracy some tactics show same results, but how can we now it before testing them? Expand

no, absolutely right. You have to test it. There should be a system, that those get tested but then not listed if providing no difference. But maybe it makes no sense at all , because where to draw the line who was the creator.

bwig said: no, absolutely right. You have to test it. There should be a system, that those get tested but then not listed if providing no difference. But maybe it makes no sense at all , because where to draw the line who was the creator. Expand

Honestly from my point of view it isn't about finding who is creating the best tactic, but finding the tactic. I'm always happy when someone score +2 points from current best tactic and it doesn't matter if the outscored one was mine, i can't see it as a competition, we're just working together trying to improve more and more. By the way when i take some ideas from someone else i always try to mention him, as you can see in some of my tactic, obviously i can't do it everytime, sometimes i upload 10+ tweaks of the same tactic and i think it would be useless mention everyone whose ideas i saw in every tactic ahah
As you can see in my threads, i took inspiration from @CBP87 and @A Smile ideas

Gianaa9 said: Honestly from my point of view it isn't about finding who is creating the best tactic, but finding the tactic. ... i can't see it as a competition, we're just working together trying to improve more and more. Expand

Well said. It would be nice some people stopped behaving like they are creating some sort of art masterpiece, or discovering the cure for cancer. No one wins a Nobel Prize for making a FM tactic. So get a life, it's just a computer game, meant to be fun. I've shared a few tweaked tactics in the past, because I was having fun and succeeding with it, and wanted to share my fun with the community. So if someone makes a small tweak that performs better, brilliant! More fun and wins for everyone. That should be the purpose.