Ajax said: Hi ZaZ, I have a question about the training schedules.
How should we use:
* Growth 1 / Growth 2 * Rebalance 1 / Rebalance 2
depending on the number of matches per week?
For example:
* 0 match in the week * 1 match in the week * 2 matches in the week
Which schedule should we use in each situation? And should we alternate between 1 and 2 every week?
Thanks 🙂 Expand
The numbers 1 and 2 are reference for the number of matches in the week (that means you use 1 when you have 1 match, and 2 when you have two matches). If you have a week with zero matches, you can either book a friendly match to keep match sharpness, or if you want to rest your players you can just use either Growth or Rebalance 1, and fill up empty days with one session of Recovery (to avoid drop in match sharpness).
I will rename them to "Growth - 1 Match" and "Growth - 2 Matches" to avoid confusion.
ZaZ said: The numbers 1 and 2 are reference for the number of matches in the week (that means you use 1 when you have 1 match, and 2 when you have two matches). If you have a week with zero matches, you can either book a friendly match to keep match sharpness, or if you want to rest your players you can just use either Growth or Rebalance 1, and fill up empty days with one session of Recovery (to avoid drop in match sharpness).
I will rename them to "Growth - 1 Match" and "Growth - 2 Matches" to avoid confusion. Expand
You can also use Growth 2 in weeks with two matches. My recommendation is 3 Growths for 1 Rebalance, and I gave versions for one and two matches to make it easier to set up under any condition. If you have a week too busy (like three matches), you can move Rebalance to that week since it is easier to fit with super-rest after the matches.
The only tactic I manage win the the club world cup with, I lose only 1 game in 4 seasons invincible in 3 seasons. Win 8 trophies in 1 season. Unbelievable tactic
max 737 said: The only tactic I manage win the the club world cup with, I lose only 1 game in 4 seasons invincible in 3 seasons. Win 8 trophies in 1 season. Unbelievable tactic Expand
Thank you for testing! Glad it is working well for you.
Most tactics of the first page are equally good. The difference of 0.1 pt per season is not enough to make a noticeable difference, so it is all about what kind of game the player wants to see in the field.
Snsnnsjsjs said: I have a question, if you are a worse team should u play on cautious, balanced? Expand
I tested positive here, and it not only had a lower win rate, but also conceded more goals than attacking. I did not test balanced and cautious here, but in my personal tests it did not do very well. That is why I prefer to do this tactic as the default defensive, and adjust to very attacking only if I need to score more goals.
max 737 said: The only tactic I manage win the the club world cup with, I lose only 1 game in 4 seasons invincible in 3 seasons. Win 8 trophies in 1 season. Unbelievable tactic Expand
did you make any changes to tactic or is it this version?
ZaZ said: I tested positive here, and it not only had a lower win rate, but also conceded more goals than attacking. I did not test balanced and cautious here, but in my personal tests it did not do very well. That is why I prefer to do this tactic as the default defensive, and adjust to very attacking only if I need to score more goals. Expand
Do you mean you start off on defensive mentality and go to very attacking when need goals?
max 737 said: Do you mean you start off on defensive mentality and go to very attacking when need goals? Expand
No, I mean "Attacking" is already the mentality that concedes the least with this tactic. If you want to concede less, it is better to switch to some tactic with the same formation and less goals conceded, like this: https://fm-arena.com/thread/19142-swaps/
ZaZ said: No, I mean "Attacking" is already the mentality that concedes the least with this tactic. If you want to concede less, it is better to switch to some tactic with the same formation and less goals conceded, like this: https://fm-arena.com/thread/19142-swaps/ Expand
Thanks, but your tactic is smashing it mate, its the best tactic currently on the FM
max 737 said: Thanks, but your tactic is smashing it mate, its the best tactic currently on the FM Expand
Thanks! I just mean you can train up to three tactics at once, and it might be worthy to setup one of those slots for a more defensive tactic with the same formation, for matches in which you want to hold a score. I will do some tests for a defensive version of this tactic, focused in conceding less goals without losing much win rate.
Hi ZaZ,
I have a question about the training schedules.
How should we use:
* Growth 1 / Growth 2
* Rebalance 1 / Rebalance 2
depending on the number of matches per week?
For example:
* 0 match in the week
* 1 match in the week
* 2 matches in the week
Which schedule should we use in each situation?
And should we alternate between 1 and 2 every week?
Thanks 🙂
Ajax said: Hi ZaZ,
I have a question about the training schedules.
How should we use:
* Growth 1 / Growth 2
* Rebalance 1 / Rebalance 2
depending on the number of matches per week?
For example:
* 0 match in the week
* 1 match in the week
* 2 matches in the week
Which schedule should we use in each situation?
And should we alternate between 1 and 2 every week?
Thanks 🙂
The numbers 1 and 2 are reference for the number of matches in the week (that means you use 1 when you have 1 match, and 2 when you have two matches). If you have a week with zero matches, you can either book a friendly match to keep match sharpness, or if you want to rest your players you can just use either Growth or Rebalance 1, and fill up empty days with one session of Recovery (to avoid drop in match sharpness).
I will rename them to "Growth - 1 Match" and "Growth - 2 Matches" to avoid confusion.
ZaZ said: The numbers 1 and 2 are reference for the number of matches in the week (that means you use 1 when you have 1 match, and 2 when you have two matches). If you have a week with zero matches, you can either book a friendly match to keep match sharpness, or if you want to rest your players you can just use either Growth or Rebalance 1, and fill up empty days with one session of Recovery (to avoid drop in match sharpness).
I will rename them to "Growth - 1 Match" and "Growth - 2 Matches" to avoid confusion.
0 match
Growth 1
1 match
Growth 1
2 matchs
Rebalance 2 ??
Ajax said: 0 match
Growth 1
1 match
Growth 1
2 matchs
Rebalance 2 ??
You can also use Growth 2 in weeks with two matches. My recommendation is 3 Growths for 1 Rebalance, and I gave versions for one and two matches to make it easier to set up under any condition. If you have a week too busy (like three matches), you can move Rebalance to that week since it is easier to fit with super-rest after the matches.
Hey Zaz, I just wanted to say a huge thank you for everything you do for this community. It's so great to have you here
Hi. Files with training schedules is not working
tzahy said: Hey Zaz, I just wanted to say a huge thank you for everything you do for this community. It's so great to have you here
Thank you! The community here is pretty friendly, so all I do is answer what people ask.
danielos2344 said: Hi. Files with training schedules is not working
Ohh, it might be the special characters. I will remove the parenthesis and reupload. Thank you for letting me know!
P.S.: Done!
The only tactic I manage win the the club world cup with, I lose only 1 game in 4 seasons invincible in 3 seasons. Win 8 trophies in 1 season. Unbelievable tactic
@max 737 Do you think this is the best tactic for this version right now?
max 737 said: The only tactic I manage win the the club world cup with, I lose only 1 game in 4 seasons invincible in 3 seasons. Win 8 trophies in 1 season. Unbelievable tactic
Thank you for testing! Glad it is working well for you.
Tiago Simoes said: @max 737 Do you think this is the best tactic for this version right now?
Most tactics of the first page are equally good. The difference of 0.1 pt per season is not enough to make a noticeable difference, so it is all about what kind of game the player wants to see in the field.
Tiago Simoes said: @max 737 Do you think this is the best tactic for this version right now?
Yes sir this is the best tactic in FM 26 atm!!!
I have a question, if you are a worse team should u play on cautious, balanced?
Snsnnsjsjs said: I have a question, if you are a worse team should u play on cautious, balanced?
same I have this question, but i think it's been working for me, I check pre match expectations before i play and decide based off that.
but would like to hear your view on this @ZaZ
Snsnnsjsjs said: I have a question, if you are a worse team should u play on cautious, balanced?
I tested positive here, and it not only had a lower win rate, but also conceded more goals than attacking. I did not test balanced and cautious here, but in my personal tests it did not do very well. That is why I prefer to do this tactic as the default defensive, and adjust to very attacking only if I need to score more goals.
max 737 said: The only tactic I manage win the the club world cup with, I lose only 1 game in 4 seasons invincible in 3 seasons. Win 8 trophies in 1 season. Unbelievable tactic
did you make any changes to tactic or is it this version?
RoTHMaNS said: did you make any changes to tactic or is it this version?
Don't make any changes to the tactic play with the same attacking mentality!
ZaZ said: I tested positive here, and it not only had a lower win rate, but also conceded more goals than attacking. I did not test balanced and cautious here, but in my personal tests it did not do very well. That is why I prefer to do this tactic as the default defensive, and adjust to very attacking only if I need to score more goals.
Do you mean you start off on defensive mentality and go to very attacking when need goals?
max 737 said: Do you mean you start off on defensive mentality and go to very attacking when need goals?
No, I mean "Attacking" is already the mentality that concedes the least with this tactic. If you want to concede less, it is better to switch to some tactic with the same formation and less goals conceded, like this: https://fm-arena.com/thread/19142-swaps/
ZaZ said: No, I mean "Attacking" is already the mentality that concedes the least with this tactic. If you want to concede less, it is better to switch to some tactic with the same formation and less goals conceded, like this: https://fm-arena.com/thread/19142-swaps/
Thanks, but your tactic is smashing it mate, its the best tactic currently on the FM
max 737 said: Thanks, but your tactic is smashing it mate, its the best tactic currently on the FM
Thanks! I just mean you can train up to three tactics at once, and it might be worthy to setup one of those slots for a more defensive tactic with the same formation, for matches in which you want to hold a score. I will do some tests for a defensive version of this tactic, focused in conceding less goals without losing much win rate.