snow halation v3

can you test it?

I  add snow halation v2




Barcelona Treble

tactic


result



striker Recommendation

PF:The type of player who passes quickly to another player rather than aiming for a goal.

AF:goal-goal player


It is based zaz-blue two top
I would like to thank ZAZ for being the basis of this tactic.

can you test it?

super korean said: tactic


result



striker Recommendation

PF:The type of player who passes quickly to another player rather than aiming for a goal.

AF:goal-goal player

can you test it? Expand

So it's ZaZ Blue from last year with a few tweaks?? no credit to ZaZ, bit naughty

@super korean, hi.

When your tactic is based on someone else's tactic you should always mention that and give credit to that person otherwise it looks like plagiarism and that's not cool at all.

Please, edit the opening post and add proper credits.

Thank you.

Zippo said: @super korean, hi.

When your tactic is based on someone else's tactic you should always mention that and give credit to that person otherwise it looks like plagiarism and that's not cool at all.

Please, edit the opening post and add proper credits.

Thank you. Expand

It has only two changes from Blue 0.4, which was not tested here but was shared around. I don't mind anyone editing a tactic, but credits are nice.

@ZaZ thank you for your amazing tactic! Looking forward from the original creator to make it better!

Chocorelo19 said: @ZaZ thank you for your amazing tactic! Looking forward from the original creator to make it better! Expand

Thanks, but no need to make this bigger than it is. I am sure super korean didn't mean to do anything unfair and will fix it promptly.

As I said in Farnecas thread, I am using Blue myself when playing, but I decided to explore other directions to give more options to players and see what else works. when next ME is released, I will explore further the options that look more promising, including Blue. No need to dig too deep in a single direction when everything might change in a couple of weeks.

Zippo said: @super korean, hi.

When your tactic is based on someone else's tactic you should always mention that and give credit to that person otherwise it looks like plagiarism and that's not cool at all.

Please, edit the opening post and add proper credits.

Thank you. Expand

sorry

I guess I copied other people's tactics to improve my rating.

We will make sure these things never happen again.

super korean said: sorry

I guess I copied other people's tactics to improve my rating.

We will make sure these things never happen again. Expand

I think It's alright to do that but maybe next time try to give credits to the author and list the changes you made. I think @ZaZ will think the same.

super korean said: sorry

I guess I copied other people's tactics to improve my rating.

We will make sure these things never happen again. Expand

It's fine, I don't mind it at all! I'm actually grateful that people use my tactics as a base because it gives me hints on how to improve, or gives me the freedom to explore other paths. Anyway, just make sure to give credits when it's too close to the base, because people put lots of effot to get something good.

Most tactics start using something as a base, be another tactic from FM or from real life, then change slowly with time until become something unique. Blue, for example, started using Duke and Gunslinger as baseline, going through lots of versions until the final version from FM21. Another example is the set pieces, which started taking routines from previous versions of Blue, Phoenix, Void and Motion, then got adjusted until I got the best results.

Best of luck there!

super korean said: sorry

I guess I copied other people's tactics to improve my rating.

We will make sure these things never happen again. Expand

The point is that there's nothing wrong in tweaking other people's tactic but when you do that you should always give credit to them. For example, if your tactic is based on ZaZ's tactic then you should mention that in the opening post and give him credit for his work.

Do you agree with that?

He wouldn't have done it on purpose.
However, among the best tactics on this site, there are always many outstanding tactics by Zaz. so I think it's not bad to always be careful.

Zaz's tactical direction is always correct and outstanding, but I hope there will be more new creative attempts by others.

Zippo said: The point is that there's nothing wrong in tweaking other people's tactic but when you do that you should always give credit to them. For example, if your tactic is based on ZaZ's tactic then you should mention that in the opening post and give him credit for his work.

Do you agree with that? Expand

Yes, I agree.

you always work hard

Gaksital said: He wouldn't have done it on purpose.
However, among the best tactics on this site, there are always many outstanding tactics by Zaz. so I think it's not bad to always be careful.

Zaz's tactical direction is always correct and outstanding, but I hope there will be more new creative attempts. Expand

Haha, I wouldn't say my directions are always correct. I just test a lot, so I get some hints of what usually works and what doesn't. I'm happy enough that there are different shapes with good results this year, be it with three defenders, three strikers or the basic 442.

ZaZ said: Haha, I wouldn't say my directions are always correct. I just test a lot, so I get some hints of what usually works and what doesn't. I'm happy enough that there are different shapes with good results this year, be it with three defenders, three strikers or the basic 442. Expand

WelI... i haven't used all your tactics, but I generally agree with most of your tactical instructions to victories.
I just wanted to applaud your many such attempts and outstanding competencies. I'm always thankful.

Gaksital said: WelI... i haven't used all your tactics, but I generally agree with most of your tactical instructions to victories.
I just wanted to applaud your many such attempts and outstanding competencies. I'm always thankful. Expand

Thank you so much!

About being original in this game, it gets harder and harder the close you get to the top, because some instructions and formations simply work well while others just don't work at all. The higher the score, the harder to get away from that set of best instructions and formations. That's why I'm so happy we have such a good variety of formations with 5.8+ score, because in FM21, the best tactic with three defenders was 0.5 points behind the best.

ZaZ said: Thank you so much!

About being original in this game, it gets harder and harder the close you get to the top, because some instructions and formations simply work well while others just don't work at all. The higher the score, the harder to get away from that set of best instructions and formations. That's why I'm so happy we have such a good variety of formations with 5.8+ score, because in FM21, the best tactic with three defenders was 0.5 points behind the best. Expand

As you say, in the process of discovering which things are effective or ineffective, I think there have been many creative attempts by outstanding users like you. I'm still a lot behind, but I really like it now that there are quite a variety of tactics at the tops.

@ZaZ  How do you think this tactic is better than fanecas? Here are the differences between snow halation v3 tactics and Fanecas

1) IWB-At
2) DW-Su
3) One Pf, one AF
4) Or Positive mentality?

Sane said: @ZaZ  How do you think this tactic is better than fanecas? Here are the differences between snow halation v3 tactics and Fanecas

1) IWB-At
2) DW-Su
3) One Pf, one AF
4) Or Positive mentality? Expand

More like a combination, to be honest. Positive with DW makes it more stable in the back while IWB-At makes it better in attack. I am not sure if PF makes much of a difference, so I can't talk about it.

Keep in mind that the difference between those two tactics is negligible and could very much fall under the precision range of these tests (5-7%), with 0.036 points per match. In a season of 38 matches, that would be less than 2 points. To be fair, the difference to Orange is not so big either, we can only assume it's better because the goal difference is clearly superior.

Gratz for the score @super korean. GJ!

Hello! @super korean can you or anyone recommend home/away game mentality changes and tactical changes i.e. play for set pieces away or similar? Cautious in hard games with set pieces maybe? No OI's too I'm guessing.

"snow halation v3" tactic works like a charm with FM Bayern.

Good.

22.2

Media prediction 12



snow halation v3