This isn’t a message to the creator, but who ever runs the ‘test’ . How can you have win% + loss% = 100% when there are clearly draws in the screenshots of the test league? Take test one Human team 4, win percentage is 74.4%, draw is 15.6% loss is 10%: still very good results but the header is incorrect
Im not a fan of the strikerless systems so i made this tactic. its a adaptation of fm24 tactic originally made by the GOAT deli, also using his set peices.
tested with burnley and finishing 3rd 71 points- broja 22 goals tested with man city finishing 1st 102 points - haaland 100 goals
Hi guys, I’ve just seen this thread and thought I’d give it a go. It’s telling me sesko and Calvert lewin would be better full backs than my actual full backs? Am I missing something?
a 433 tested with city, won every trophy, haaland scored over 100 goals. set peices left to assistant, the fitness was froze to full health. lost one league game all season. not a set of bad results
I just changed the BWM to a MEZa and I won my first game 11-1, 1st in league v 15th . 9-1 at half time, subs killed the momentum but not a bad 45 mins 😂 I changed it as the focus play is on left so it made sense to have another players operating in that area of the pitch. It would protease tog very open v better teams. Both CF grabbed a hat trick. My squad would probably be better suited to a mirror image of the tactic and the focus on the right
Thank you for clearing that up 🤦🏼♂️
tested with burnley and finishing 3rd 71 points- broja 22 goals
tested with man city finishing 1st 102 points - haaland 100 goals