We've decided to get rid of "Standings" and use "Ratings" instead.
We found that "Standings" concept can be quite confusing, for example, there could be a big difference in standings between tactics but a very small difference in the results.
We find that the "Ratings" concept gives a better view on the difference between tactics.
Let's say some tactic's got the 1st place in the table and other tactic's got the 20th place in table the table but the difference in the score between the tactics is just 1 point which means there's almost no difference between them and the rating helps to see it.
Hi friends,
We've decided to get rid of "Standings" and use "Ratings" instead.
We found that "Standings" concept can be quite confusing, for example, there could be a big difference in standings between tactics but a very small difference in the results.
We find that the "Ratings" concept gives a better view on the difference between tactics.
We hope you like it.
Thanks Alex,
It looks awesome
nice work
I like it
Thanks!
and how ratings are decide?
zeristeu said: and how ratings are decide?
I don't think you are interested in knowing the actual formula because it looks geeky
The ratings just make it much easier to gauge the difference between tactics and it's as simple as that
zeristeu said: and how ratings are decide?
Let's say some tactic's got the 1st place in the table and other tactic's got the 20th place in table the table but the difference in the score between the tactics is just 1 point which means there's almost no difference between them and the rating helps to see it.