|
Uploaded Date
|
Downloads
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mar 22, 2023
|
472
|
latest patchPatch 23.5.0 ( N )
not tested yet
Patch 23.5.0
Patch 23.5.0 tests
Test #1
Date: 31.03.2023
Test #2
Date: 31.03.2023
Test #3
Date: 31.03.2023
Test #4
Date: 31.03.2023
Test #5
Date: 31.03.2023
Test #6
Date: 31.03.2023
Test #7
Date: 31.03.2023
Test #8
Date: 31.03.2023
Test #9
Date: 31.03.2023
Test #10
Date: 31.03.2023
Test #11
Date: 31.03.2023
Test #12
Date: 31.03.2023
Create an account or log in to leave a comment
Testing the difference between regular and asymmetrical strikers
Wow 6 point difference from https://fm-arena.com/thread/4860-442-best-of-both-worlds-v4/
Only change was moving the striker?
TommyToxic said: Only change was moving the striker?
The only change was the striker. Besides some possible RNG luck lol
TommyToxic said: Only change was moving the striker?
Blau said: The only change was the striker. Besides some possible RNG luck lol
Yes, the asym striker does the trick - https://fm-arena.com/thread/4846-433-hybrid-1/
I've also noticed that asymmetric strikers work much better, because the defenders don't adapt to that, so with this they overload one side of the defence.
Also, good job - I think asymmetric tactics are where the progress is still possible.
Looks a solid tactic. Do you find the DM covers the space behind the LWB when they go forward? As in theory down the left you have 2 more attacking roles, I will try this for sure, but might try with standard FB role on left for added stability as i love keeping clean sheets! Cheers
Great results for a 442
Have you tried inverting duties on the left flank i.e. WB (at) and IF (su)? Should work well with a DM (de) on the same side and maybe help adding more width (if necessary)
wheelerdealer said: Looks a solid tactic. Do you find the DM covers the space behind the LWB when they go forward? As in theory down the left you have 2 more attacking roles, I will try this for sure, but might try with standard FB role on left for added stability as i love keeping clean sheets! Cheers
I think having the DM helps and I like the combo of an IF with a WB overlapping. A FB would work fine though so it's really up to what you prefer.
TargetPerson said: Great results for a 442
Have you tried inverting duties on the left flank i.e. WB (at) and IF (su)? Should work well with a DM (de) on the same side and maybe help adding more width (if necessary)
I have not tried that. I would be worried that the left side would struggle to break down the defense without the inside forward on attack with the strikers asymmetrical to the right. However, I think it would work with normal strikers. Feel free to test it out!