Author
Uploaded Date
Downloads
Oct 30, 2023
53
latest patchPatch 24.4.0 (DB3.0)
not tested yet
Patch 24.0.1 (DB1.0)
ok
55.2
47.2
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
51.2
+1
66
65
1,200
Matches
Patch 24.0.1 (DB1.0) tests
click to hide
Test #1
Date: 30.10.2023
Test #2
Date: 30.10.2023
Test #3
Date: 30.10.2023

Another narrow shape that I want to check with the Brazilian box OVLP instructions

Cheers,

0

@letsgo9, hi.

Check the policy on naming tactics - https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/

Thanks.

1

Aka change name of it :))

0

Droid said: @letsgo9, hi.

Check the policy on naming tactics - https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/

Thanks.


It's fixed now?

0

letsgo9 said: It's fixed now?

You have to change the name of the tactic to something that would be in line with the tactic naming policy.

Read the link that @Droid gave you, it explains everything about naming tactics very well.

1

@letsgo9 try to move 2CMs up to AM position and the one AM to CM position to see if 2AMs are better than 2CMs. You can also create asymmetric with one CM on the left side and one DM on the right side or opposite.

1

dzek said: @letsgo9 try to move 2CMs up to AM position and the one AM to CM position to see if 2AMs are better than 2CMs. You can also create asymmetric with one CM on the left side and one DM on the right side or opposite.

10 points deduction only coz the shape lmao. I wonder if a IF or a IW dittinh narrow would have more value than one AM

1

letsgo9 said: 10 points deduction only coz the shape lmao
In a normal season?

0

dzek said: In a normal season?

In relation to brazilian box

1

I've started a short save as Sampdoria on the new patch, only signing two centrebacks, and I've got to say this tactic has been quite impressive so far.

Definitely needs to be tested on the new patch!

1
Create an account or log in to leave a comment