Uploaded Date
|
Downloads
|
|
---|---|---|
Dec 7, 2023
|
1,450
|
latest patchPatch 24.4.0 (DB3.0)
not tested yet
Patch 24.2.0 (DB1.0)
Create an account or log in to leave a comment
A tweak version of 4231 Hegemony (through) created by @A Smile.












Mentality
Attacking --> Positive
TIs
Added: Distribute To Centre-Backs, Slow Pace Down
Removed: Focus Play Down Both Flanks, Distribute Quickly, Get Stuck In, Step Up More
PIs
Removed 'Shoot Less Often' from WBs and 'Tackle Harder' from GK.
PLAYER INSTRUCTIONS
Finally, a 4-2-3-1 tactical.
Werrun said: Finally, a 4-2-3-1 tactical.
Erik, is that you? GGMU
PI please i play on FMT, do u use OI?
dzek said: Erik, is that you? GGMU
Shhhh. Keep quiet please. I come here to download your tactical to imporve my team this week. Don't let Bournemouth known about it.
Gj dzek!
anyone PI please helpp
Good job!Can you keep trying the underlap? I've tested many different variations myself before, and even without changing any of the other instructions, the holiday test results are just as strong. It's amazing, and it doesn't make sense... The combination of duties in the 4231 formation is so strong that I don't think the comparison of the test results of these different offensive sets even 4,000 games can be truly accurate.
A Smile said: Good job!Can you keep trying the underlap? I've tested many different variations myself before, and even without changing any of the other instructions, the holiday test results are just as strong. It's amazing, and it doesn't make sense... The combination of duties in the 4231 formation is so strong that I don't think the comparison of the test results of these different offensive sets even 4,000 games can be truly accurate.
I have already test underlaps in any possible way in terms of TIs and it seems that they decrease the score. It has to do with formation and roles. I agree with the rest
I tested it here for 5 games and liked what I saw. The tactic better controls the game and ball possession. Some simple victories, but without suffering, and other easy victories.
The biggest highlight is that the tactic is not 100% intensity. This means that in the long term in a league there is less wear and tear on players without loss of points and income.
Let's see how it goes with 2400 games
Eddie said: I tested it here for 5 games and liked what I saw. The tactic better controls the game and ball possession. Some simple victories, but without suffering, and other easy victories.
The biggest highlight is that the tactic is not 100% intensity. This means that in the long term in a league there is less wear and tear on players without loss of points and income.
That's exactly what I wanted to do. Thanks for the confirmation!
Eddie said: Let's see how it goes with 2400 games
I don't think it will last but what you say above confirms that I have fulfilled my goal.
- Better control the game / Ball Possession
- "Low" intensity tactic for the long run of a normal season
dzek said: I have already test underlaps in any possible way in terms of TIs and it seems that they decrease the score. It has to do with formation and roles. I agree with the rest

Let me try
A Smile said: Let me try

Go on!!
anyone can give me player instruction, i desperate trying this tactic
dzek said: Go on!!
boss pls give me ur PI
gohan said: anyone can give me player instruction, i desperate trying this tactic

gohan said: boss pls give me ur PI
Check the OP.
hi guy, first post here
nice to find a tactic with less intensity, do you tried with balanced mentality ?
chakalfm said: hi guy, first post here

nice to find a tactic with less intensity, do you tried with balanced mentality ?
Hi,
No I didn't and I don't know if there will be a change in terms of the score here at FM-Arena. You can always change it to Balanced when you want to maintain a lead or relax your players
GK Instructions?
impersonal2556 said: GK Instructions?
No instructions
Enjoying this so far, 2nd season I am moving from a 4-3-3 and this 4-2-3-1 plays nice football, is there any room for experimenting with the CDM roles?
Peter78 said: Enjoying this so far, 2nd season I am moving from a 4-3-3 and this 4-2-3-1 plays nice football, is there any room for experimenting with the CDM roles?
I'm glad to hear that
You could do the following:
Aggressive approach:
Change one of the two to VOL(Su).
Defensive approach:
Change one of the two to DLP(Su). He'll help more with possession of the ball with more passes but may make a few turnovers. Also he holds his position better than the DM role defensively.
So far that's all.
cheers i'll have a look at making those changes