Red General 4231 v2.0

Here's another strategy for my 4231 VLIFS tactic

Can someone post Player instructions

The Beast said: Can someone post Player instructions Expand

Yeah

So, PIs were fking the tactic during all the time. GJ!

Grimlock said: Yeah Expand

The attacking power is clear, but I would like to know if there are advantages in using the balanced approach when your team is weaker and playing away from home or needs to hold the result against a big team at the end of games, especially away.

Does it indicate continuing the attack or changing to balanced, positive or another suggestion?

Eddie said: The attacking power is clear, but I would like to know if there are advantages in using the balanced approach when your team is weaker and playing away from home or needs to hold the result against a big team at the end of games, especially away.

Does it indicate continuing the attack or changing to balanced, positive or another suggestion? Expand

This is a good question, I usually in the scenarios you mentioned, especially at the end of the game and away, is to adjust according to the situation, the adjustment idea is from the mentality, the rhythm as the main adjustment program, at the beginning of the away game, I usually selectively drop a frame of mind, that is, aggressive, according to the situation of the game to make adjustments, at the end of the game (the win has been decided), I usually drop a frame of rhythm and mindset! , which preserves fitness.

Eddie said: The attacking power is clear, but I would like to know if there are advantages in using the balanced approach when your team is weaker and playing away from home or needs to hold the result against a big team at the end of games, especially away.

Does it indicate continuing the attack or changing to balanced, positive or another suggestion? Expand
Read here - https://fm-arena.com/thread/7458-is-it-worth-to-use-defensive-tactics-away-from-home/

Well done, brother! Blessings from China!Very eye-catching！

I think we saw the positive effect of more matches for the first time. The tactic, which received 62 points with 2400 matches, received 63 points with 4000. Interesting

How much did he buy with 1200? I couldn't see it, I missed.

pixar said: How much did he buy with 1200? I couldn't see it, I missed. Expand

It got 62 pts after 1200 matches

pixar said: I think we saw the positive effect of more matches for the first time. The tactic, which received 62 points with 2400 matches, received 63 points with 4000. Interesting Expand
We've also seen the downside that some systems have stayed at 2400 matches and we don't know if they're going to progress, get worse or stay the same. I'm talking specifically about the tactics that are within the HoF.

EDIT: And as I've said many times it would be nice in the HoF section to have tactics that have equal or more than 1.50 PPG because all results are converted to regular season games and in a regular season if you don't have at least half the points then it's not considered as an overachieve.

The reason behind this is because we are aiming to overachieve with a team that has a CA average that is in the middle of the league. If we use the best or worst team then the RNG will be higher due to the skill of our players and so the score here will not fully represent the results we get in a regular season or over time.

pixar said: I think we saw the positive effect of more matches for the first time. The tactic, which received 62 points with 2400 matches, received 63 points with 4000. Interesting

How much did he buy with 1200? I couldn't see it, I missed. Expand

I think it was 62 points, 66 goals scored, 52 goals allowed.

Sebastian33 said: Well done, brother! Blessings from China!Very eye-catching！ Expand

Thanks for the support bro, we come from the same place

CSTG KANE said: xie xie zhi chi Expand

Hi,

Please, edit your post because only English language is allowed here.

Thanks.

dzek said: We've also seen the downside that some systems have stayed at 2400 matches and we don't know if they're going to progress, get worse or stay the same. I'm talking specifically about the tactics that are within the HoF. Expand

Yes, I had some doubts and disappointments when I saw the results of test 3

Droid said: Hi,

Please, edit your post because only English language is allowed here.

Thanks. Expand

sorry

CSTG KANE said: Yes, I had some doubts and disappointments when I saw the results of test 3 Expand
What do you mean the results of test 3? Test number 3 or 3rd run of tests?

dzek said: What do you mean the results of test 3? Test number 3 or 3rd run of tests? Expand

I'm referring to the results of Test #3, which looks a bit bad

Amazing! Well done!

CSTG KANE said: I'm referring to the results of Test #3, which looks a bit bad Expand
I don't think it's something to worry about since the overall result is what speaks in the end but until we know the RNG range for this year then we don't really know which tactic is better than the other.

Anyone compared in their game this one and the hegemomy?

Congrats, New Sheriff in town !!!

Impressive!

Skin link pls

Lovely clean PIs, I'm very impressed

why one inside forward is support and the other attack?

Hey guys,

I just want to let you know that we've decided if after 1200 matches a tactic gets a score that is 2 points away from the top tactic then it'll get an additional testing up to 2400 matches.

At the moment there're about 12 tactics that scored at least 61 points(2 points away from the top) after 1200 matches in the queue to get tested up to 2400 matches.

Cheers.

drake87 said: why one inside forward is support and the other attack? Expand

Yes, I was very curious too.