Author
Uploaded Date
Downloads
Jan 30, 2021
470
latest patchPatch 21.4.0
WIN 64%
LOSE 36%
good
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
73
114
+34
82
48
912
Matches
Patch 21.3.0
WIN 67%
LOSE 33%
excellent
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
76
114
+41
91
50
456
Matches
Patch 21.2.2
WIN 62%
LOSE 38%
good
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
71
114
+32
81
49
456
Matches
Patch 21.4.0 tests
click to hide
Test #1
Date: 25.03.2021
Test #2
Date: 25.03.2021
Test #3
Date: 25.03.2021
Test #4
Date: 25.03.2021
Test #5
Date: 25.03.2021
Test #6
Date: 25.03.2021
Patch 21.3.0 tests
click to show
Patch 21.2.2 tests
click to show

Hi

Can you test this tactic?

0

@salzby, I might be blind but I don't see any tactic attached to your post... where are the tactics? :)

0

additional  stuff:
I was (still I'm ) a reader of FM base or Si Community page, Not  big fun of Knap though - guy is producing "fuckilions" of tactic every single year, doing his tests within 1 hour, diff form etc  - huge respect for him for still doing this. TTFF- hmmm guy was goood in 2017-18... but he liked to be the best too much. For me the best game breaker tactics creator were Mr. Langvatn or Mr Hough. Single tactic /formation - game breakers- improved by creators or forums members.
take a look at Si forum - dominated by KNAP ... that's why I've log in into FMarena and decide to write something we need fresh look and tests like "attributes impact"

0

Pierluigi @Droid  - added sorry and THX

0

salzby said: Pierluigi @Droid  - added sorry and THX

Hi,

Why did you name your tactic AP & DM ? I see on the screenshot it uses BBM and RGA?

It might be you uploaded a wrong tactic or a wrong screenshot ? Or just the name is misleading ? :blink:

0

Name is APDM_S MOD - as I say I'm not a original creator of tactic, which is Magician. APDM MOD-ification is being done by healumth - _S means I've altered set pieces  (corners mainly) - and MOD means I've changed APDM into B2B_reg. Have Been member of FM base SI for too long to "catch" any benefits form original creator of tactic for someone else. My tactic is just a modification of:
Magicani Phoenix 1.0 > Haelmuth mod APDM>
I think all forums (FM base, SI) should work like this.
Guys like Knap TFF (hmm) , should find best formations for given FM edition - then just relay on forum guys to modify/tinker. From my experience every single cm/FM edition has a game breaker Plug&play tactic - diablo like (2004 - right?????)  Overall goal is to win everything either it will be top 10 world clubs or  6 tier san marino league (egh - no:-)

0

salzby said: Name is APDM_S MOD - as I say I'm not a original creator of tactic

Just for the record, healmuth's AP&DM tweak is literally Phoenix v1.0 tactic with 2 tweaks:

1) DPL(S) was changed to DM(S)
2) CM(A) was changed to AP(A)

If you changed AP(A) to BBM(S) and DM(S) to RGA(S) then there's nothing left from healmuth's APDM tweak :)

Probably, that's why people asking you why you named your tactic APDM tweaks if there's nothing left from that tweak :D

It makes sense to name your tactic Phoenix v1.0 BBM(S) & RGA(S) tweak or something like that.

0

I t will make sense to call it whatever you want If it get score 7.1.:-)

0

@Zippo could you please also test healmuth APDM mod I think deserves a test.

0

salzby said: @Zippo could you please also test healmuth APDM mod I think deserves a test.

Hi,

Changes CM-A to AP-A and DLP-S to DM-S have been tested already

CA-A and DLP-S setup got 6.9 rating - https://fm-arena.com/tactic/732-zaz-red/

AP-A and DM-S got 6.7 rating - https://fm-arena.com/tactic/745-zaz-red/


Regarding your tactic... the opening post looks messy, it's very hard to understand what tactic you tweaked and what changes you made, please, clean it a bit and I'll take a look once more.

Thanks.

0



First game with the tactic, looking good.

0

@Zippo
Ok OP changed.
My tactic has B2B & Regista at CM and DM positions.
Wingers on support Vs Defensive wingers in other tested tactics.
Other Differences between my tactic and those already  by you:
Mentality - Positive vs Attacking in other tactics
In Possession:
Shorter passing vs Slightly shorter passing
Run at defence unmarked vs Run at defence marked in other tactics

Above hasn't been tested yet.

0
Create an account or log in to leave a comment