CBP87 424 Expressive

Holiday tested, best XI selected, AM in charge of training, SPC in charge of SP

It is the same as the top tactical EF 424 IF HP V2 P101 AC...... but the score has dropped from 63.2 to 62.8, it is not known whether this is due to random test results or SI tweaks to the match engine.

A Smile said: It is the same as the top tactical EF 424 IF HP V2 P101 AC...... but the score has dropped from 63.2 to 62.8, it is not known whether this is due to random test results or SI tweaks to the match engine. Expand

It's not the same pal, albeit all I added was be more expressive. Just wanted to see if this had any impact on the end result plus I also wanted to see how it would test with run at defence

CBP87 said: It's not the same pal, albeit all I added was be more expressive. Just wanted to see if this had any impact on the end result plus I also wanted to see how it would test with run at defence Expand

I can't understand what the specific difference is through the translation software, I just can't find any difference through comparison.

CBP87 said: It's not the same pal, albeit all I added was be more expressive. Just wanted to see if this had any impact on the end result plus I also wanted to see how it would test with run at defence Expand

There isn't BeMoreExpressive in the picture... but if it's really the same tactic it could be random effect

Edit:
I checked and it looks to be identical to the top one

Gianaa9 said: There isn't BeMoreExpressive in the picture... but if it's really the same tactic it could be random effect

Edit:
I checked and it looks to be identical to the top one Expand

Ah shit, you're right. Apologies @A Smile you were right too. I'll upload the correct version when I'm able to. I don't think I can get this thread removed due to it being tested

CBP87 said: Ah shit, you're right. Apologies @A Smile you were right too. I'll upload the correct version when I'm able to. I don't think I can get this thread removed due to it being tested Expand

When we are constantly adjusting to a tactic, it is normal for such things to happen. To my surprise, the test results of 4800 or even 9600 matches still have a difference of 0.4 points. I think SI has adjusted something in the background, which leads to the instability of the test results. Although I don't have a relatively scientific and reasonable testing method like ARENA, I still feel this instability.

CBP87 said: Ah shit, you're right. Apologies @A Smile you were right too. I'll upload the correct version when I'm able to. I don't think I can get this thread removed due to it being tested Expand

Don't worry i can relate, when you're testing lots of tactics it's easy to upload a wrong one, at least it's interesting to see how a tactic which is leading the table since months can score so much less without any tweak

A Smile said: When we are constantly adjusting to a tactic, it is normal for such things to happen. To my surprise, the test results of 4800 or even 9600 matches still have a difference of 0.4 points. I think SI has adjusted something in the background, which leads to the instability of the test results. Although I don't have a relatively scientific and reasonable testing method like ARENA, I still feel this instability. Expand

That's completely normal. As you can see from the tables it is estimated that results are correct within rougly +-1 point. 0,4 is well within that range.

Pretty sure SI hasn't touched FM24 since march.

Even at 9600 runs, with the level of uncertainty in FM, you are bound to still have meaningful uncertainty about the effect of small tweaks. Also, the tactics at the very top of the list are more likely than not to be the ones that had random variation working in their favor along the way.

The mirror version was 63.1