All outfield positions use the same formula. GKs have a separate formula.
Anecdotally... my Strikers with Jumping Reach below 13 perform far worse than slower strikers with more jumping reach. My goalkeeper with 18 Reflexes & Agility, but 10 Aerial reach performed worse than my 15 Jumping reach, 14 Agility, 15 Reflex keeper.
Below average impact attributes seem to have critical impact. But this may be subjective. I do recall the tests mentioning that work-rate up to 12 has a big impact, but almost none afterwards. This might apply to other attributes as well.
Possebrew said: All outfield positions use the same formula. GKs have a separate formula.
Anecdotally... my Strikers with Jumping Reach below 13 perform far worse than slower strikers with more jumping reach. My goalkeeper with 18 Reflexes & Agility, but 10 Aerial reach performed worse than my 15 Jumping reach, 14 Agility, 15 Reflex keeper.
Below average impact attributes seem to have critical impact. But this may be subjective. I do recall the tests mentioning that work-rate up to 12 has a big impact, but almost none afterwards. This might apply to other attributes as well. Expand
It was good of you to bring this up. First of all, I wanted to thank you for your work. It worked out really well here. I started a save with Marseille, and in the first season I only didn't win the Champions League; in the second season I won everything.
Let's go. I was thinking of separating them by position, and then putting in all the necessary attributes for the position up to 12, and then using the program to choose which one to pick, knowing that they all have at least 12 in the important attributes for the position.
Possebrew said: All outfield positions use the same formula. GKs have a separate formula.
Anecdotally... my Strikers with Jumping Reach below 13 perform far worse than slower strikers with more jumping reach. My goalkeeper with 18 Reflexes & Agility, but 10 Aerial reach performed worse than my 15 Jumping reach, 14 Agility, 15 Reflex keeper.
Below average impact attributes seem to have critical impact. But this may be subjective. I do recall the tests mentioning that work-rate up to 12 has a big impact, but almost none afterwards. This might apply to other attributes as well. Expand
Maybe this should be included in the score calculation in this case for the striker? I mean the JR
Possebrew said: All outfield positions use the same formula. GKs have a separate formula.
Anecdotally... my Strikers with Jumping Reach below 13 perform far worse than slower strikers with more jumping reach. My goalkeeper with 18 Reflexes & Agility, but 10 Aerial reach performed worse than my 15 Jumping reach, 14 Agility, 15 Reflex keeper.
Below average impact attributes seem to have critical impact. But this may be subjective. I do recall the tests mentioning that work-rate up to 12 has a big impact, but almost none afterwards. This might apply to other attributes as well. Expand
Yeah I do this aswell, personally I set cbs to jr 14+, dm/cm jr 13+ and stc 13+ jr
plus i go position by position filtering on competent in whatever position, worked pretty good tbf
jason13 said: It was good of you to bring this up. First of all, I wanted to thank you for your work. It worked out really well here. I started a save with Marseille, and in the first season I only didn't win the Champions League; in the second season I won everything.
Let's go. I was thinking of separating them by position, and then putting in all the necessary attributes for the position up to 12, and then using the program to choose which one to pick, knowing that they all have at least 12 in the important attributes for the position. Expand
Everything else was personal observation, so I wouldn't want to pollute the formula with my subjective opinion. However, I do use my subjective opinion when filtering for players in Scouting.
Any chance you're playing FM24 in a different language? The parser atm only supports English.
That is because not only Table Header names are different (eg.: Name, Position, Age), but also because the position names are different, and do not follow the pattern: D (R), AM (RLC), etc. Expand
still it gives error to me though changing language
I would like to share my experiences with you guys. It works wonderfully, in every sense of the word.
I'm playing in 2026, and I built my team from scratch based on the scores on the site. And just now, something like this happened in the Champions League semi-final.
Terem Moffi scored 7 goals in a Champions League semi-final match. Let's take a look at his profile
Yes, I know he looks like an regular player. But he scored 17 goals in 11 Champions League matches and 39 goals in 26 Premier League matches. and his CP is only 143.
That is 16 points lower than Gyökeres, and Gyökeres' finishing is 18, while Moffin's is 15.
but both have the same score and yield. (better score than Lukaku)
The bottom line is that it is possible to acquire more efficient players at a lower cost and achieve success. It is evident that CP is merely a display, and the true value lies in the characteristics demonstrated in these tests.
mir1337 said: I would like to share my experiences with you guys. It works wonderfully, in every sense of the word.
I'm playing in 2026, and I built my team from scratch based on the scores on the site. And just now, something like this happened in the Champions League semi-final.
Terem Moffi scored 7 goals in a Champions League semi-final match. Let's take a look at his profile
Yes, I know he looks like an regular player. But he scored 17 goals in 11 Champions League matches and 39 goals in 26 Premier League matches. and his CP is only 143.
That is 16 points lower than Gyökeres, and Gyökeres' finishing is 18, while Moffin's is 15.
but both have the same score and yield. (better score than Lukaku)
The bottom line is that it is possible to acquire more efficient players at a lower cost and achieve success. It is evident that CP is merely a display, and the true value lies in the characteristics demonstrated in these tests. Expand
I usually play LLM, but if memory serves:
Haaland and Mbappe have around 500
So anything around 400-500 should be good
Possebrew said: I usually play LLM, but if memory serves:
Haaland and Mbappe have around 500
So anything around 400-500 should be good
for each position such a score dc and dmc too?
All outfield positions use the same formula. GKs have a separate formula.
Anecdotally... my Strikers with Jumping Reach below 13 perform far worse than slower strikers with more jumping reach.
My goalkeeper with 18 Reflexes & Agility, but 10 Aerial reach performed worse than my 15 Jumping reach, 14 Agility, 15 Reflex keeper.
Below average impact attributes seem to have critical impact. But this may be subjective.
I do recall the tests mentioning that work-rate up to 12 has a big impact, but almost none afterwards. This might apply to other attributes as well.
Possebrew said: All outfield positions use the same formula. GKs have a separate formula.
Anecdotally... my Strikers with Jumping Reach below 13 perform far worse than slower strikers with more jumping reach.
My goalkeeper with 18 Reflexes & Agility, but 10 Aerial reach performed worse than my 15 Jumping reach, 14 Agility, 15 Reflex keeper.
Below average impact attributes seem to have critical impact. But this may be subjective.
I do recall the tests mentioning that work-rate up to 12 has a big impact, but almost none afterwards. This might apply to other attributes as well.
It was good of you to bring this up. First of all, I wanted to thank you for your work. It worked out really well here. I started a save with Marseille, and in the first season I only didn't win the Champions League; in the second season I won everything.
Let's go. I was thinking of separating them by position, and then putting in all the necessary attributes for the position up to 12, and then using the program to choose which one to pick, knowing that they all have at least 12 in the important attributes for the position.
Possebrew said: All outfield positions use the same formula. GKs have a separate formula.
Anecdotally... my Strikers with Jumping Reach below 13 perform far worse than slower strikers with more jumping reach.
My goalkeeper with 18 Reflexes & Agility, but 10 Aerial reach performed worse than my 15 Jumping reach, 14 Agility, 15 Reflex keeper.
Below average impact attributes seem to have critical impact. But this may be subjective.
I do recall the tests mentioning that work-rate up to 12 has a big impact, but almost none afterwards. This might apply to other attributes as well.
Maybe this should be included in the score calculation in this case for the striker? I mean the JR
Possebrew said: All outfield positions use the same formula. GKs have a separate formula.
Anecdotally... my Strikers with Jumping Reach below 13 perform far worse than slower strikers with more jumping reach.
My goalkeeper with 18 Reflexes & Agility, but 10 Aerial reach performed worse than my 15 Jumping reach, 14 Agility, 15 Reflex keeper.
Below average impact attributes seem to have critical impact. But this may be subjective.
I do recall the tests mentioning that work-rate up to 12 has a big impact, but almost none afterwards. This might apply to other attributes as well.
Yeah I do this aswell, personally I set cbs to jr 14+, dm/cm jr 13+ and stc 13+ jr
plus i go position by position filtering on competent in whatever position, worked pretty good tbf
jason13 said: It was good of you to bring this up. First of all, I wanted to thank you for your work. It worked out really well here. I started a save with Marseille, and in the first season I only didn't win the Champions League; in the second season I won everything.
Let's go. I was thinking of separating them by position, and then putting in all the necessary attributes for the position up to 12, and then using the program to choose which one to pick, knowing that they all have at least 12 in the important attributes for the position.
My statement about work-rate was based on this research here:
https://fm-arena.com/thread/13685-current-24-4-latest-version-full-attribute-test-52000-match-samples/
However the formula is based on this research:
https://fm-arena.com/thread/14009-attribute-testing-football-manager-24/
Everything else was personal observation, so I wouldn't want to pollute the formula with my subjective opinion. However, I do use my subjective opinion when filtering for players in Scouting.
cadoni said: Yes, it is work.
Can you give a little more guidance regarding the output score? For example, what score should be ok - good for EPL team?
Here's a sample of a quickstart with MAN City
For DC & DMC, the top seems to be in the high 300s.
Antonio Rüdiger is the only one above 400.
Possebrew said: Here's a sample of a quickstart with MAN City
For DC & DMC, the top seems to be in the high 300s.
Antonio Rüdiger is the only one above 400.
Nice! Thank you!
It would be nice if you put a filter in score as well, like showing only players with specific score and higher (or lower) for example.
Persnonally how much of a points gap do you need between a player to replace them with a new one from the tool?
5+, 10+?
OpticFawn said: Persnonally how much of a points gap do you need between a player to replace them with a new one from the tool?
5+, 10+?
I don't know the answer to that.
You'll have to play around with it, and find out for yourself.
Hello, where do we put the data we downloaded from your site?
I didnt under
Possebrew said: kamas1 figured out the solution to this bug.
Any chance you're playing FM24 in a different language?
The parser atm only supports English.
That is because not only Table Header names are different (eg.: Name, Position, Age), but also because the position names are different, and do not follow the pattern: D (R), AM (RLC), etc.
still it gives error to me though changing language
I would like to share my experiences with you guys.
It works wonderfully, in every sense of the word.
I'm playing in 2026, and I built my team from scratch based on the scores on the site.
And just now, something like this happened in the Champions League semi-final.
Terem Moffi scored 7 goals in a Champions League semi-final match.
Let's take a look at his profile
Yes, I know he looks like an regular player.
But he scored 17 goals in 11 Champions League matches and 39 goals in 26 Premier League matches.
and his CP is only 143.
That is 16 points lower than Gyökeres, and Gyökeres' finishing is 18, while Moffin's is 15.
but both have the same score and yield. (better score than Lukaku)
The bottom line is that it is possible to acquire more efficient players at a lower cost and achieve success. It is evident that CP is merely a display, and the true value lies in the characteristics demonstrated in these tests.
mir1337 said: I would like to share my experiences with you guys.
It works wonderfully, in every sense of the word.
I'm playing in 2026, and I built my team from scratch based on the scores on the site.
And just now, something like this happened in the Champions League semi-final.
Terem Moffi scored 7 goals in a Champions League semi-final match.
Let's take a look at his profile
Yes, I know he looks like an regular player.
But he scored 17 goals in 11 Champions League matches and 39 goals in 26 Premier League matches.
and his CP is only 143.
That is 16 points lower than Gyökeres, and Gyökeres' finishing is 18, while Moffin's is 15.
but both have the same score and yield. (better score than Lukaku)
The bottom line is that it is possible to acquire more efficient players at a lower cost and achieve success. It is evident that CP is merely a display, and the true value lies in the characteristics demonstrated in these tests.
Good stuff bro, what tactic are you running?
Hi, first of all thanks for for the calculator
Just wanna share my experience using it
This is a save Argentine 2º Division
Started with a insane low odds to win the league
After using the calculator to get the best available players for each role, manage to win the league
in the 1º season
@mir1337
Hey mate. Would you explain to how am I use it?