Author
Uploaded Date
Downloads
ZaZ
Mar 27, 2023
2,151
latest patchPatch 23.5.0 ( N )
excellent
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
54.8
+6
75
69
4,000
Matches
Patch 23.5.0
excellent
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
64.5
+21
81
60
1,920
Matches
Patch 23.5.0 ( N ) tests
click to hide
Test #1
Date: 30.04.2023
Test #2
Date: 30.04.2023
Test #3
Date: 30.04.2023
Test #4
Date: 30.04.2023
Test #5
Date: 30.04.2023
Test #6
Date: 30.04.2023
Test #7
Date: 30.04.2023
Test #8
Date: 30.04.2023
Test #9
Date: 30.04.2023
Test #10
Date: 30.04.2023
Patch 23.5.0 tests
click to show

Based on this tactic. Since players are holding the ball better than before, I removed the instruction to Distribute Quickly and set attacking throw-ins to deliver short.



3

ZaZ said: Based on this tactic. Since players are holding the ball better than before, I removed the instruction to Distribute Quickly and set attacking throw-ins to deliver short.





Yo, a question you said that the "reliable set pieces on corner defend" were better then this one?
Just asking because i am gonna test some set pieces and i wanted to know if i have to re-test reliable or not.

0

Delicious said: Yo, a question you said that the "reliable set pieces on corner defend" were better then this one?
Just asking because i am gonna test some set pieces and i wanted to know if i have to re-test reliable or not.


To be fair, they are too close to draw any conclusion. Would need @Zippo to help testing that, because I don't think the results can be measured well with normal tests. There is a big difference between optimal and normal set pieces, but between two good set pieces, the difference is minimal.

1

ZaZ said: To be fair, they are too close to draw any conclusion. Would need @Zippo to help testing that, because I don't think the results can be measured well with normal tests. There is a big difference between optimal and normal set pieces, but between two good set pieces, the difference is minimal.

I did tested those on previous patch, that's why i am asking,will try something different then!
Thank you for the reply

1

hei @ZaZ
what about prefered foot on both winger

WL = Left Footed
WR = Right Footed

or it doesn't matter at all?

0

marbola said: hei @ZaZ
what about prefered foot on both winger

WL = Left Footed
WR = Right Footed

or it doesn't matter at all?


Foot doesn't matter, I usually even train my wingers to play on both sides so I have extra options.

2

awesome tac <3 whitch one training you usin zaz ? :)

0

great tactic, easy to tweak in to diamond when lacking strikers

2

what does it mean (N)?

0

Chatin said: what does it mean (N)?

It mean the new testing mechanism was used

0

@ZaZ or anyone, where would you suggest putting your best or fastest strikers in this?

0

Pip said: @ZaZ or anyone, where would you suggest putting your best or fastest strikers in this?

I found tallest and slowest striker(Target Man) in the middle and speed left and right

0

Pip said: @ZaZ or anyone, where would you suggest putting your best or fastest strikers in this?

Middle player will get more opportunities, because he participates from attacks from left, right and middle. So, it's better to have the best striker there.

0

second season with Salernitana, we won double.
As you can see we invested in Pace a lot, but after testing attributes for last few days i also think that tactic is very important too, and also investing in at least few other attributes then just pace, acceleration is vital.

great tactic!

3

White Europe said: second season with Salernitana, we won double.
As you can see we invested in Pace a lot, but after testing attributes for last few days i also think that tactic is very important too, and also investing in at least few other attributes then just pace, acceleration is vital.

great tactic!


Gratz, and thanks for showing your results!

1

Maybe this isn't the right place for this question, but if anyone knows the answer it's @ZaZ .

From a player development standpoint, should I prioritize a tactic that maximizes one of the testing variables?  In other words, will a tactic with 74 GF, but 69 GA help/hurt development vs. a tactic that tests at 65 GF and 58 GA?

Thanks!

0

Brilliant tactic,started using it after the Hertha Berlin game.Probably my favourite tactic Ive used so far.Going to try it with a different team now.

1

what is the training routine to use with this tactic?

0

BadA said: Maybe this isn't the right place for this question, but if anyone knows the answer it's @ZaZ .

From a player development standpoint, should I prioritize a tactic that maximizes one of the testing variables?  In other words, will a tactic with 74 GF, but 69 GA help/hurt development vs. a tactic that tests at 65 GF and 58 GA?

Thanks!


There is a correlation between player growth and player ratings after matches. That means if a player gets higher ratings, it will usually develop faster than a player that does not perform well so often. That being said, goals and assists usually contribute more for development than defensive statistics, so a tactic with 74 GF will PROBABLY be better for development than one with 65 GF. However, keep in mind that you can have tactics with very high GF and bad performance overall, so I assume you are considering tactics with the same rating in the table.

joncoughlan said: Brilliant tactic,started using it after the Hertha Berlin game.Probably my favourite tactic Ive used so far.Going to try it with a different team now.

Gratz and thanks for testing! I hope you have lots of success with your new runs. =)

Geo said: what is the training routine to use with this tactic?

The schedule I use for the entire season is shown below. Just make sure to set automatic rest for all players under excellent condition, like the second picture.

0

what are your trainings for pre season and regular season? how is the evolution of your players with this training? and the physical condition?

0

Geo said: what are your trainings for pre season and regular season? how is the evolution of your players with this training? and the physical condition?

It is the same schedule for the whole season. The growth is high and balanced through all attributes, and the physical condition is enough for you to repeat your squad regularly.

0

ZaZ said: It is the same schedule for the whole season. The growth is high and balanced through all attributes, and the physical condition is enough for you to repeat your squad regularly.

Do you train roles and give player individual training as well ie quickness training?

0

RamboJambo said: Do you train roles and give player individual training as well ie quickness training?

Both.

0

ZaZ said: Both.

Just tried doing this. Applied the table, set the intensity and been getting injuries all from training like once or twice a week.

0

Sextuple said: Just tried doing this. Applied the table, set the intensity and been getting injuries all from training like once or twice a week.

Check by the end of season if you are getting below or above the average from the league, and from what is expected from your team. Checking what happens one or two weeks in advance can be deceiving, since you can have just some bad luck.

0

for the strikers should a right footer be on the right and a left footer be on the left or does that matter?

0

ArsenalHighbury said: for the strikers should a right footer be on the right and a left footer be on the left or does that matter?

Difference is nearly non-existent.

0

what ratings would You use in genie scout? if You using this tool?

0

White Europe said: what ratings would You use in genie scout? if You using this tool?

There is a whole thread about that here. Mark is more qualified to talk about those things than me.

0

ZaZ said: There is a whole thread about that here. Mark is more qualified to talk about those things than me.

Yeah, i was going trough this thread and it looks like people still using ratings from fm21, and just wonder about Your opinion as im new to genie scout, and don't even see it as great help or i just don't know hiw to use it yet😅

0
Create an account or log in to leave a comment