Training Schedules

What u mean manualy?i cannot import files but i need to setup it by myself day after day ri9ght?
You do for one week, then copy and paste for the rest of the year.
What about team bonding? Does that matter? Because i dnt see it in the schedules, but it has been important in previous fms.
It is not very important (players gain happiness in other ways like winning and other training sessions), and it has negative effect on attribute gain.
 
There is a workaround to build part-time schedules. In the "new schedule" screen, you can load a native part-time schedule and modify it. You can then save it and it will be a part-time schedule that can be saved/loaded for part-time clubs.

I've built the 5 schedules from @ZaZ as part-time schedules (obvisouly not as efficient as full-time as HarvestGreen's data was all about progress from Full-time schedules as far as I know).

They are doing pretty well in my save, but I have no data-science-level information on how well they behave. My gut feeling is that my players are doing well :D
 

Attachments

BTW, this is how I jammed it in the 3-days available spots. A/B/C/D are all similar, just with different tactical familiarity focus.
1794505190938.webp
1794505129889.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZaZ
There is a workaround to build part-time schedules. In the "new schedule" screen, you can load a native part-time schedule and modify it. You can then save it and it will be a part-time schedule that can be saved/loaded for part-time clubs.

I've built the 5 schedules from @ZaZ as part-time schedules (obvisouly not as efficient as full-time as HarvestGreen's data was all about progress from Full-time schedules as far as I know).

They are doing pretty well in my save, but I have no data-science-level information on how well they behave. My gut feeling is that my players are doing well :D
Oh mate GJ thank you for that , doing this manualy is shiet :D
So i am putiing :
A,B,C,D and after 50% tactick understanding i switch to growth?
Thank you once again.

ANd for U-18 and U-21 all the time growth right?
 
I haven't got far eough in the game yet to see how U18/U21 players gain tactical understanding from simply playing the tactic for a couple of years before making the big team :|
 
I did a simple experiment with tactical understanding. First screen shows understanding at the first day of a new save. Second shows the result of training each tactical understanding sessions once a month, after players return from holiday at the start of a new season. Third screenshot shows the same, but with two tactical understanding sessions per month. As you can see, tactical understanding seems to decay pretty fast.

You can interpret this in multiple ways, but it seems like players understand more the tactic when they never trained it than after training for a whole season. Apparently they would need around 8 sessions per week to counter the decay.
 

Attachments

  • 1794552187803.webp
    1794552187803.webp
    28.2 KB · Views: 96
  • 1794552196271.webp
    1794552196271.webp
    28.3 KB · Views: 94
  • 1794552202757.webp
    1794552202757.webp
    29.3 KB · Views: 96
I did a simple experiment with tactical understanding. First screen shows understanding at the first day of a new save. Second shows the result of training each tactical understanding sessions once a month, after players return from holiday at the start of a new season. Third screenshot shows the same, but with two tactical understanding sessions per month. As you can see, tactical understanding seems to decay pretty fast.

You can interpret this in multiple ways, but it seems like players understand more the tactic when they never trained it than after training for a whole season. Apparently they would need around 8 sessions per week to counter the decay.
So do we not bother about TU if it shows 50% at the start of the season for a team like say Arsenal and straight away start training for GROWTH? Or TU training is still necessary?
 
Anecdotal point from real gameplay, not testing, but for me doing a lot of (6+ sessions per week) tactical effectiveness training only seems to be worthwhile at top end of premier league / champions league level, with fully built out coaching setup etc in place.

Everywhere else I'm ok with attribute growth + 2 per week TE sessions (and even the 2 per week might not be needed really). Seems to me there is more value to be gained in quickness individual training and of course signing better players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZaZ
So do we not bother about TU if it shows 50% at the start of the season for a team like say Arsenal and straight away start training for GROWTH? Or TU training is still necessary?
Need more data to make any conclusion, but for now, TU until 50% and growth after that is my recommendation.
 
Attacking ball work isnt an option for youth teams, so would you just leave it out or replace with attacking direct which is the most similar session?
 
Attacking ball work isnt an option for youth teams, so would you just leave it out or replace with attacking direct which is the most similar session?
I would need more data to give an opinion about that, and anything I say without information is just a wild guess, so I prefer to say "I do not know".
 
@ZaZ I suspect we need to rethink on the training modules we have atm. As I experimented a lot also gave training to AM. The results were better with AM handling training in the sense it led to me having more wins eventually so not sure if it was linked to AM handling training. But I experimented with custom schedule for pace, acceleration and AM handling training with the player on quickness. The later gave me better results, so I’m not sure if we are using the correct schedules. Just a food for the thought :D
 
I can only make decisions based on facts and data. Feeling is too vulnerable to biases.
 
Back
Top