Conte Ball for Spurs 3412 (Tighter marking X)

Hi, this is a 3412 tactic which is very fun.

Above are my holiday test results.

Brentford 6th, with Toney 33goals.

Chelsea 2nd, with 96pts. and Lukaku gots 60goals-25assists. Havertz and Werner did great also.

<Something i found>

If you use Defensive Wingers in the mentality of 'Positive', position mentality is 'Very Attacking'


But, if you use 'Overlap Left' or 'Overlap right' in the TI,


Defensive winger's position mentality changes to 'Attacking'.


and It's better for Back-three formation!


Note : Use wingbacks on the position of Defensive wingers!

P.S

It's my custom game with Spurs ongoing 22/23 season.

Fantastic combination between Kane and Son performs very great!!





Anyone who doesn't like 'Tighter Marking', use the no tighter-marking version

but it might be better after match-engine changes to better pressure engine.

Here's my test with Tottenham

Eric said: Here's my test with Tottenham







Expand

Thank you! It would be better if Son played AF instead of Bergwijn... haha

Gaksital said: Thank you! It would be better if Son played AF instead of Bergwijn... haha Expand

It might be but he got the highest avg. rating in the team as DW at the end of the season. Also, Bergwijn did very well as AF.

Eric said: It might be but he got the highest avg. rating in the team as DW at the end of the season. Expand

u're right, sonny might played as AF at some games, i think.

i think the best combination for two-tops is TF-at with AF-at.

Not only Bergwijn but also everyone did well in that position.

Eric said: It might be but he got the highest avg. rating in the team as DW at the end of the season. Also, Bergwijn did very well as AF. Expand

@Eric , can i share your test result to other community?

Gaksital said: @Eric , can i share your test result to other community? Expand

Sure, why not?

Leeds, predicted 12th

Sandro said: Leeds, predicted 12th




Expand

Thanks! It would be bad for underdogs.

Gaksital said: Thanks! It would be bad for underdogs. Expand

I'd say it did Ok... overachieved for few places above the media prediction before the season so it isn't bad at all.

Sandro said: I'd say it did Ok... overachieved for few places above the media prediction before the season. Expand

I'm testing a new one for underdogs which includes changes DWs to WBs(DM). I think it would be better for underdogs... thanks!

This tactic is quite entertaining with Arsenal

Poacher said: This tactic is quite entertaining with Arsenal



Expand

Thank you!!

Taken together, many tests include yours reveal this tactic have quite a few loopholes in the backspace because it is too aggressive.

However, the TF-AF-SS trio's performance in all tests certainly seems to be outstanding!

The change to 'Balanced' mentality seems to be helpful now.

I also should test with many other changes.

Any noticeable difference in performance when it comes to both versions? Looks a fun setup

avonseller said: Any noticeable difference in performance when it comes to both versions? Looks a fun setup Expand

Unfortunately, the only difference i found is that one with 'tighter marking' is more suitable for the top-dogs.

when it comes to the other problem, like difference between DWs and WBs(DM)

Regardless of what WBs' or DWs' mentality are, I also realized that they are essentially different in positioning when defense.

When i see the in-game positioning map after several tests, DW has never been in a lower position than WB when defense in any case.

Always fun to use a Target Forward

Target Person said: Always fun to use a Target Forward Expand

Combination between Target Forward and Advanced forward is very satisfactory

Gaksital said: Regardless of what WBs' or DWs' mentality are, I also realized that they are essentially different in positioning when defense.

When i see the in-game positioning map after several tests, DW has never been in a lower position than WB when defense in any case. Expand

Yeah that makes sense, maybe if you used DWs on defend they'd be a better comparison but it'd impact the attack negatively which is a plus for the tactic (81 goals with Brentford is nice)