Author
Uploaded Date
Downloads
Dec 23, 2021
188
latest patchPatch 22.4.1
average
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
40.3
-16
50
66
456
Matches
Patch 22.2.0
average
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
44.7
-11
53
64
304
Matches
Patch 22.4.1 tests
click to hide
Test #1
Date: 04.03.2022
Test #2
Date: 04.03.2022
Test #3
Date: 04.03.2022
Patch 22.2.0 tests
click to show



First of all, shoutouts to the Laziale for the backline and lack of offside trap. I tried to tweak it but honestly there's not much I'd like to improve there and saw no point in submitting an inferior version of it just to make it more personalized, so I will acknowledge that this tactic has kept a lot of the same roles and instructions. Like most of my own tactics however, this started as a hyper offensive one. It had two Mezzala's running wide, overlapping with WBs on attack but came to realize that it doesn't really bring enough offensive power forward to compensate for the massive hole you leave defensively, which made me question why I had a backline of 5 to begin with. So instead I opted to go the more defensive route, replaced the Mezzala's with BWMs, who -- unlike the SVs in Laziale, aims to win the ball higher up the field and to connect with the striker trio which has been extremely effective this year just as a standalone thing, and was more or less the only strong point of the original version of this tactic.

I've been tweaking the heck out of this, been through about 12 versions simply to test the effects of changing one instruction at a time and this has been the most effective one yet. I'll keep testing and submitting more version if I come across something that performs better. I have some more ideas in mind that I want to test but so far I'm satisfied with this being the 1.0.

td;dr: It's a defensively strong tactic that emulates the strongest defensive tactic submitted, but should also score more. Also please excuse the ridiculous name of this tactic, I've recently started coding my tactics with a color and a season to help me remember them better, so yeah.

Been running this in 4 leagues that all suggest this is a a tactic that's difficult to score versus, for a defensive tactic we also don't have much trouble scoring.


In Europe it also causes some upsets in the home leg but generally proceeded to get battered in the away legs vs superior teams.

0

I think you need to post results if you want your tactic gets tested

1

Updated the 1st post with four different runs using this tactic. Quite happy, it's a defensive tactic and performs really well when the teams are near equal but doesn't necessarily destroy teams where the gap is a bit larger like some of these other tactics, which is why my target teams were: 1) In leagues they are expected a top2 finish with at least one similar strength team, 2) teams from all kinds of levels in the league, 3) were in the Champions League.

0
Create an account or log in to leave a comment