|
Uploaded Date
|
Downloads
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Dec 8, 2020
|
355
|
latest patchPatch 21.4.0
not tested yet
Patch 21.1.3
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
66.6
+25
95
70
456
Matches
Patch 21.1.3 tests
Test #1
Date: 08.12.2020
Test #2
Date: 08.12.2020
Test #3
Date: 08.12.2020
Create an account or log in to leave a comment
Same as ZaZ - Total Football, but changed the roles from fowards and wingers to relieve from defense duty. Also changed wingbacks to allow overlap. Very high pace with short and vertical passing.
Tests were made picking the teams predicted to end first and last in the Premier League, then setting the tactics and going in vacation for the rest of the season.
ZaZ said: Same as ZaZ - Total Football, but changed the roles from fowards and wingers to relieve from defense duty. Also changed wingbacks to allow overlap. Very high pace with short and vertical passing.
Also, this tactic should be clearly distinguished from your previous tactic.
Tests were made picking the teams predicted to end first and last in the Premier League, then setting the tactics and going in vacation for the rest of the season.
Hi,
Please, could you give this tactic a different name. "Test - 2" doesn't look cool.
Thank you.
Zippo said: Hi,
Also, this tactic should be clearly distinguished from your previous tactic.
Please, could you give this tactic a different name. "Test - 2" doesn't look cool.
Thank you.
Sure, I forgot to rename the file. Gonna change it.
@Zippo, let me know if you want me to change the namee to something less generic. I've been thinking of using elemental dragons, like "Fire Dragon", Earth Dragon" and such, to keep it unique.
ZaZ said: @Zippo, let me know if you want me to change the namee to something less generic. I've been thinking of using elemental dragons, like "Fire Dragon", Earth Dragon" and such, to keep it unique.
nahh.. there's no need for different names, the current names are fine
Fixing the same error as Total Football, I changed the BPD to Pass it Shorter and set the SK to defend, so they don't waste possession because of their Take Risks default instruction. I holiday tested the tactics twice, with first and last media prediction teams, and got the following results.
I am not sure how much better this is, but it got my best result so far for second team (20° in media prediction). Since the change is probably not enough for it to be tested again, I would be happy if users could try it and tell me what they think.