Has there been a change in how many matches a tactic will be tested for? I've noticed over the last few days that tactics that have scored relatively high, have only been tested for a few thousand matches.
Below are just a few examples of tactics that have scored high but not been tested for the usual 9300 matches -
Our dedicated algorithm determines how many matches to test a tactic and it's constantly adjusting.
CBP87 said: I've noticed over the last few days that tactics that have scored relatively high, have only been tested for a few thousand matches. Expand
It's just the scores that were considered by the algorithm as "relatively high scores" some time ago, now aren't considered as "relatively high scores" due to the increase of the top score.
Our dedicated algorithm determines how many matches to test a tactic and it's constantly adjusting.
It's just the scores that were considered by the algorithm as "relatively high scores" some time ago, now aren't considered as "relatively high scores" due to the increase of the top score.
Appreciate time / resource is always the limiting factor which explains why you couldn't (and shouldn't) put poorly performing tactics through the same number of tests as those that perform well but it's truly bonkers you don't test the elite tactics the same number of times. How can you say with any conviction #1 is better than #2 when they've been tested a different number of matches (given the only reason you test them thousands of times is because of the effect of RNG)?!?
Hi @Zippo and @Droid,
Has there been a change in how many matches a tactic will be tested for? I've noticed over the last few days that tactics that have scored relatively high, have only been tested for a few thousand matches.
Below are just a few examples of tactics that have scored high but not been tested for the usual 9300 matches -
https://fm-arena.com/thread/11046-424-classic-x-mi-v1-4/
https://fm-arena.com/thread/11038-424-mi-su7-wb-tweak/
https://fm-arena.com/thread/11020-424-classic-v44/
Thanks
Hi, @CBP87.
Our dedicated algorithm determines how many matches to test a tactic and it's constantly adjusting.
CBP87 said: I've noticed over the last few days that tactics that have scored relatively high, have only been tested for a few thousand matches.
It's just the scores that were considered by the algorithm as "relatively high scores" some time ago, now aren't considered as "relatively high scores" due to the increase of the top score.
I hope that helps.
Cheers.
Zippo said: Hi, @CBP87.
Our dedicated algorithm determines how many matches to test a tactic and it's constantly adjusting.
It's just the scores that were considered by the algorithm as "relatively high scores" some time ago, now aren't considered as "relatively high scores" due to the increase of the top score.
I hope that helps.
Cheers.
Cheers mate, appreciate the response
Appreciate time / resource is always the limiting factor which explains why you couldn't (and shouldn't) put poorly performing tactics through the same number of tests as those that perform well but it's truly bonkers you don't test the elite tactics the same number of times. How can you say with any conviction #1 is better than #2 when they've been tested a different number of matches (given the only reason you test them thousands of times is because of the effect of RNG)?!?