66connor66 said: Thanks for sorting, Intersting to see as some of my 200 scored players down to 30! Need a rebuild now Expand
That is not to say that this is correct. It is an attempt. Let me know how it works out, it may very well be, that the performance of the new formula is worse than the old one.
I'd welcome any suggestions on how to improve it and make it more relevant & accurate.
Gabriel here has 0. Imho, it is correct, and he doesn't deserve any spot on my team.
ScratchMyDog said: @Possebrew I have been LOVING this tool. But something definitely broke in this morning's update. I only use the Squad Data tool, and beyond it having negative scores now (perhaps intended?), the corner attribute is coming in with triple digits, and one of my best players who was a ~170 before (i'm in lower leagues) is a -270 now. My actual best player who was a 290 is now a 48. Very very strange, and a 15yo kid who was a ~95 is now a 290.
I loved the tool - I was close to building one myself but let me go back to the old formula plz!! Expand
I'll add the option to the settings screen to switch to the old formula.
Update: I added the toggle to the attribute settings screen. Can you please check if it works for you?
Possebrew said: That is not to say that this is correct. It is an attempt. Let me know how it works out, it may very well be, that the performance of the new formula is worse than the old one.
I'd welcome any suggestions on how to improve it and make it more relevant & accurate.
Gabriel here has 0. Imho, it is correct, and he doesn't deserve any spot on my team. Expand
Interesting. I am doing a level 10 to prem challenge and using the tool at some point throughout. The main player I can remember who scored into the 100s / 200s was this one (scored 210 at one point)
Another question? Not sure if just me or anyone else. But when searching players were coming up in the 700s. After I signed went down to 300s in squad view and then signed some more and went back into squad vies and now down in the 100s?
66connor66 said: Another question? Not sure if just me or anyone else. But when searching players were coming up in the 700s. After I signed went down to 300s in squad view and then signed some more and went back into squad vies and now down in the 100s?
The second gyazo was the second time I looked at squad view... in the 1st he went to 450. Same for all players Expand
Ah, that was a bug caused by the dynamic normalization. That is players with -270 would push all other scores up by 270, so the lowest would be 0. I made it so scores won't go into the negatives now. So 0 will be the lowest.
Possebrew said: Ah, that was a bug caused by the dynamic normalization. That is players with -270 would push all other scores up by 270, so the lowest would be 0. I made it so scores won't go into the negatives now. So 0 will be the lowest. Expand
Ahh makes sense when I got rid of worse players scores matched up more
@Possebrew Do you think it makes sense to take away a points from, for example, DC for having a low dribbling or finishing or long shots etc? Because it seems to me that such attributes in this case do not matter for a central defender, what do you think about it?
thepunisher23 said: Hello, excellent tool, is it possible to add the best substitutes per position in team builder? Expand
Can you describe how you imagine that working? Usually I use the data analysis tab for that, and I pick source: "Squad" and the position I am looking to substitute
Kamas1 said: @Possebrew Do you think it makes sense to take away a points from, for example, DC for having a low dribbling or finishing or long shots etc? Because it seems to me that such attributes in this case do not matter for a central defender, what do you think about it? Expand
I don't know about that. My IWB Left gets quite a few goals from long shots. And Long Shot + "Shoots with power" tends to lead to a lot of goals.
Also Ball Playing Defender is the recommended role for a CD. With Player Instruction of "Dribble More".
I'm really confused by the new scores, what would you now say is a decent score? I know I can revert back to the previous score system and with that I would aim to get players who had a score of 360+ but I'm struggling to figure how the new scoring system works
Possebrew said: I don't know about that. My IWB Left gets quite a few goals from long shots. And Long Shot + "Shoots with power" tends to lead to a lot of goals.
Also Ball Playing Defender is the recommended role for a CD. With Player Instruction of "Dribble More". Expand
CBP87 said: I'm really confused by the new scores, what would you now say is a decent score? I know I can revert back to the previous score system and with that I would aim to get players who had a score of 360+ but I'm struggling to figure how the new scoring system works Expand
You can go into Man City, for example, and scan their team, then we have a point of reference. I did this with Bayern Munich in my save, and they musiala have had around 650.
Excellent work, I absolutely love using it. However, I’ve encountered an issue for me, well not exactly an issue, but something that bothers me.
When building my team, I try to select only players who are Natural in the positions I use, and when I upload the "Players in Range" or "Squad Data" lists to the Calculator, I choose players this way as well. But sometimes, after I transfer a selected player from the list, the Team Builder tab in the Calculator shows that the player needs to play in a position where they are Accomplished, not Natural.
In my save managing Man City, for the past three seasons I’ve constantly had to buy players for the DMC position because the Team Builder says the player should play as DC or as DL (if they’re accomplished there), rather than in their Natural position. I'm guessing that Team Builder is trying to reach best average score for starting 11 with the list provided.
I’m wondering if it’s possible to add an option to limit the Team Builder tab to only the positions in which players are Natural?
Kamas1 said: You can go into Man City, for example, and scan their team, then we have a point of reference. I did this with Bayern Munich in my save, and they musiala have had around 650. Expand
This is indeed how I also do it. Although, I do not care about absolute scores that much, as I am still on my MAN save since I wrote the calculator.
My filter always includes Interested in Transfer & Loan, as it doesn't make sense for me to filter for players that don't want to play for my team.
Afterwards, I set Work-Rate to 10 as a pre-filter, and ACC/PAC to 15/15. then I increment Acc/Pac until I reduced player-found to under 250.
My standard process goes like this: 1. I load my fresh squad-data, players-in-range & scouted data whenever I intend to begin scouting. 2. I go position by position for my squad and check if the best player in Data-Analysis is a player in my squad or if there's someone else ranking higher. 3. Based on the gap between players, I decide whether to buy/loan a new player. 4. Repeat for each individual position in my formation.
I am quite surprised how many of you request features for the team-builder, as I myself almost never use it. So I assume some of you already have more expertise in using the calculator than me
Esyuelo said: Excellent work, I absolutely love using it. However, I’ve encountered an issue for me, well not exactly an issue, but something that bothers me.
When building my team, I try to select only players who are Natural in the positions I use, and when I upload the "Players in Range" or "Squad Data" lists to the Calculator, I choose players this way as well. But sometimes, after I transfer a selected player from the list, the Team Builder tab in the Calculator shows that the player needs to play in a position where they are Accomplished, not Natural.
In my save managing Man City, for the past three seasons I’ve constantly had to buy players for the DMC position because the Team Builder says the player should play as DC or as DL (if they’re accomplished there), rather than in their Natural position. I'm guessing that Team Builder is trying to reach best average score for starting 11 with the list provided.
I’m wondering if it’s possible to add an option to limit the Team Builder tab to only the positions in which players are Natural? Expand
I am not sure I understand your question. Afaik, the positions in the position field are only Natural Positions.
The team-builder auto-picks the first result you would get for a given position in the data-analysis tab. So if you add a Defender Right position from the dropdown, it would pick the first player that contains D R in their position.
If we added the Sec. Position to the views, we could also obtain the accomplished positions. Like the player here, you may notice he is an AM (RL) Natural, but a M (R) Accomplished.
CBP87 said: I'm really confused by the new scores, what would you now say is a decent score? I know I can revert back to the previous score system and with that I would aim to get players who had a score of 360+ but I'm struggling to figure how the new scoring system works Expand
I always load my own squad along with players I plan on buying, then pick players with a higher rating than the ones in my team, who are interested in playing for me.
I never thought of them as absolutes, but relative.
If you have the game editor, and want to know the absolute peak player score, I suppose you could load up someone with all 20s, and someone with all 1s to determine edge cases.
Possebrew said: I am not sure I understand your question. Afaik, the positions in the position field are only Natural Positions.
The team-builder auto-picks the first result you would get for a given position in the data-analysis tab. So if you add a Defender Right position from the dropdown, it would pick the first player that contains D R in their position.
If we added the Sec. Position to the views, we could also obtain the accomplished positions. Like the player here, you may notice he is an AM (RL) Natural, but a M (R) Accomplished. Expand
Thank you for your response. Let me try to explain my point in more detail.
Let’s say I’m looking for an AM (C) and I find a player with a score of 450. In the Data Analysis, his positions are listed as AM (RLC), ST (C). When I check in FM24, I see that he is Natural at AM (C), but only Accomplished at ST (C).
However, after I transfer him and upload my updated squad list to the Calculator, choose 4-2-3-1 formation in the tab Team Builder, it assigns him to the ST (C) position instead of AM (C), most likely because my existing ST (C) is weaker than my AM (C) in terms of score.
So, it ends up placing players in positions where they’re not Natural and I need to look another AM (C) after spending 140M EUR to an Accomplished ST (C). That’s why I’m wondering if there could be an option to make the Team Builder only assign players to positions where they are Natural, so the squad it produces matches the criteria I originally set when scouting and selecting players.
Esyuelo said: Thank you for your response. Let me try to explain my point in more detail.
Let’s say I’m looking for an AM (C) and I find a player with a score of 450. In the Data Analysis, his positions are listed as AM (RLC), ST (C). When I check in FM24, I see that he is Natural at AM (C), but only Accomplished at ST (C).
However, after I transfer him and upload my updated squad list to the Calculator, choose 4-2-3-1 formation in the tab Team Builder, it assigns him to the ST (C) position instead of AM (C), most likely because my existing ST (C) is weaker than my AM (C) in terms of score.
So, it ends up placing players in positions where they’re not Natural and I need to look another AM (C) after spending 140M EUR to an Accomplished ST (C). That’s why I’m wondering if there could be an option to make the Team Builder only assign players to positions where they are Natural, so the squad it produces matches the criteria I originally set when scouting and selecting players. Expand
That sounds more like a problem in the Team Builder, than an issue with the Natural/Accomplished. I'll try to see if I can find the cause.
Afaik, the calculator is blind to Accomplished positions, it only ever considers Natural positions.
The Team Builder in its current form is more of a placeholder solution. As I mentioned earlier, I am surprised how many of you use it. I myself only used it two or three times.
Possebrew said: This is indeed how I also do it. Although, I do not care about absolute scores that much, as I am still on my MAN save since I wrote the calculator.
My filter always includes Interested in Transfer & Loan, as it doesn't make sense for me to filter for players that don't want to play for my team.
Afterwards, I set Work-Rate to 10 as a pre-filter, and ACC/PAC to 15/15. then I increment Acc/Pac until I reduced player-found to under 250.
My standard process goes like this: 1. I load my fresh squad-data, players-in-range & scouted data whenever I intend to begin scouting. 2. I go position by position for my squad and check if the best player in Data-Analysis is a player in my squad or if there's someone else ranking higher. 3. Based on the gap between players, I decide whether to buy/loan a new player. 4. Repeat for each individual position in my formation.
I am quite surprised how many of you request features for the team-builder, as I myself almost never use it. So I assume some of you already have more expertise in using the calculator than me Expand
I aim to keep each result set under 250 players found. As work-rate under 12 has such a big impact according to another set of test results (which I can no longer find), I decided to filter the lazy bums out in-game already
Nebucco said: It doesn't work for me since the update, when I load the html file it doesn't show anything at all (English).It was flawless before. Any suggestions? Expand
That's strange. Can you DM me the HTML file you're trying to upload?
Possebrew said: This is indeed how I also do it. Although, I do not care about absolute scores that much, as I am still on my MAN save since I wrote the calculator.
My filter always includes Interested in Transfer & Loan, as it doesn't make sense for me to filter for players that don't want to play for my team.
Afterwards, I set Work-Rate to 10 as a pre-filter, and ACC/PAC to 15/15. then I increment Acc/Pac until I reduced player-found to under 250.
My standard process goes like this: 1. I load my fresh squad-data, players-in-range & scouted data whenever I intend to begin scouting. 2. I go position by position for my squad and check if the best player in Data-Analysis is a player in my squad or if there's someone else ranking higher. 3. Based on the gap between players, I decide whether to buy/loan a new player. 4. Repeat for each individual position in my formation.
I am quite surprised how many of you request features for the team-builder, as I myself almost never use it. So I assume some of you already have more expertise in using the calculator than me Expand
cadoni said: What's your attribute settings for GK? Expand
I filter for Reflex & Agility over 13 (Adjusting upwards if there's too many) and with Aerial Reach over 12. Usually that leads to about 3-5 Goalkeepers.
66connor66 said: Thanks for sorting, Intersting to see as some of my 200 scored players down to 30! Need a rebuild now
That is not to say that this is correct. It is an attempt. Let me know how it works out, it may very well be, that the performance of the new formula is worse than the old one.
I'd welcome any suggestions on how to improve it and make it more relevant & accurate.
Gabriel here has 0. Imho, it is correct, and he doesn't deserve any spot on my team.
ScratchMyDog said: @Possebrew I have been LOVING this tool. But something definitely broke in this morning's update. I only use the Squad Data tool, and beyond it having negative scores now (perhaps intended?), the corner attribute is coming in with triple digits, and one of my best players who was a ~170 before (i'm in lower leagues) is a -270 now. My actual best player who was a 290 is now a 48. Very very strange, and a 15yo kid who was a ~95 is now a 290.
I loved the tool - I was close to building one myself but let me go back to the old formula plz!!
I'll add the option to the settings screen to switch to the old formula.
Update: I added the toggle to the attribute settings screen. Can you please check if it works for you?
Possebrew said: That is not to say that this is correct. It is an attempt. Let me know how it works out, it may very well be, that the performance of the new formula is worse than the old one.
I'd welcome any suggestions on how to improve it and make it more relevant & accurate.
Gabriel here has 0. Imho, it is correct, and he doesn't deserve any spot on my team.
Interesting. I am doing a level 10 to prem challenge and using the tool at some point throughout. The main player I can remember who scored into the 100s / 200s was this one (scored 210 at one point)
https://gyazo.com/6c72208ce194f1cf829373ff3565f116
And is now down to 13
https://gyazo.com/8f6f11b72789b202065455514ef63652
Clearly not a very good player and likely why I struggled / struggling in the vanarama league. But did score very high on previous formula.
Once again thanks for putting this together interesting way to play FM and different to how I have previously played it for many years.
Another question? Not sure if just me or anyone else.
But when searching players were coming up in the 700s. After I signed went down to 300s in squad view and then signed some more and went back into squad vies and now down in the 100s?
https://gyazo.com/7b4047245fd6abf9d58280c9573c564f
https://gyazo.com/9a21d6fec13d7fdd7577dcb44cb2bfb2
The second gyazo was the second time I looked at squad view... in the 1st he went to 450. Same for all players
66connor66 said: Another question? Not sure if just me or anyone else.
But when searching players were coming up in the 700s. After I signed went down to 300s in squad view and then signed some more and went back into squad vies and now down in the 100s?
https://gyazo.com/7b4047245fd6abf9d58280c9573c564f
https://gyazo.com/9a21d6fec13d7fdd7577dcb44cb2bfb2
The second gyazo was the second time I looked at squad view... in the 1st he went to 450. Same for all players
Ah, that was a bug caused by the dynamic normalization.
That is players with -270 would push all other scores up by 270, so the lowest would be 0.
I made it so scores won't go into the negatives now. So 0 will be the lowest.
Possebrew said: I'll add the option to the settings screen to switch to the old formula.
Update: I added the toggle to the attribute settings screen. Can you please check if it works for you?
Yes, it's working! Brilliant turn around time, much love brother.
Possebrew said: Ah, that was a bug caused by the dynamic normalization.
That is players with -270 would push all other scores up by 270, so the lowest would be 0.
I made it so scores won't go into the negatives now. So 0 will be the lowest.
Ahh makes sense when I got rid of worse players scores matched up more
Hello, excellent tool, is it possible to add the best substitutes per position in team builder?
@Possebrew Do you think it makes sense to take away a points from, for example, DC for having a low dribbling or finishing or long shots etc? Because it seems to me that such attributes in this case do not matter for a central defender, what do you think about it?
thepunisher23 said: Hello, excellent tool, is it possible to add the best substitutes per position in team builder?
Can you describe how you imagine that working?
Usually I use the data analysis tab for that, and I pick source: "Squad" and the position I am looking to substitute
Kamas1 said: @Possebrew Do you think it makes sense to take away a points from, for example, DC for having a low dribbling or finishing or long shots etc? Because it seems to me that such attributes in this case do not matter for a central defender, what do you think about it?
I don't know about that. My IWB Left gets quite a few goals from long shots.
And Long Shot + "Shoots with power" tends to lead to a lot of goals.
Also Ball Playing Defender is the recommended role for a CD. With Player Instruction of "Dribble More".
I'm really confused by the new scores, what would you now say is a decent score? I know I can revert back to the previous score system and with that I would aim to get players who had a score of 360+ but I'm struggling to figure how the new scoring system works
Possebrew said: I don't know about that. My IWB Left gets quite a few goals from long shots.
And Long Shot + "Shoots with power" tends to lead to a lot of goals.
Also Ball Playing Defender is the recommended role for a CD. With Player Instruction of "Dribble More".
Ok, thanks for answer
CBP87 said: I'm really confused by the new scores, what would you now say is a decent score? I know I can revert back to the previous score system and with that I would aim to get players who had a score of 360+ but I'm struggling to figure how the new scoring system works
You can go into Man City, for example, and scan their team, then we have a point of reference. I did this with Bayern Munich in my save, and they musiala have had around 650.
Excellent work, I absolutely love using it. However, I’ve encountered an issue for me, well not exactly an issue, but something that bothers me.
When building my team, I try to select only players who are Natural in the positions I use, and when I upload the "Players in Range" or "Squad Data" lists to the Calculator, I choose players this way as well. But sometimes, after I transfer a selected player from the list, the Team Builder tab in the Calculator shows that the player needs to play in a position where they are Accomplished, not Natural.
In my save managing Man City, for the past three seasons I’ve constantly had to buy players for the DMC position because the Team Builder says the player should play as DC or as DL (if they’re accomplished there), rather than in their Natural position. I'm guessing that Team Builder is trying to reach best average score for starting 11 with the list provided.
I’m wondering if it’s possible to add an option to limit the Team Builder tab to only the positions in which players are Natural?
Kamas1 said: You can go into Man City, for example, and scan their team, then we have a point of reference. I did this with Bayern Munich in my save, and they musiala have had around 650.
This is indeed how I also do it.
Although, I do not care about absolute scores that much, as I am still on my MAN save since I wrote the calculator.
My filter always includes Interested in Transfer & Loan, as it doesn't make sense for me to filter for players that don't want to play for my team.
Afterwards, I set Work-Rate to 10 as a pre-filter, and ACC/PAC to 15/15.
then I increment Acc/Pac until I reduced player-found to under 250.
My standard process goes like this:
1. I load my fresh squad-data, players-in-range & scouted data whenever I intend to begin scouting.
2. I go position by position for my squad and check if the best player in Data-Analysis is a player in my squad or if there's someone else ranking higher.
3. Based on the gap between players, I decide whether to buy/loan a new player.
4. Repeat for each individual position in my formation.
I am quite surprised how many of you request features for the team-builder, as I myself almost never use it. So I assume some of you already have more expertise in using the calculator than me
Esyuelo said: Excellent work, I absolutely love using it. However, I’ve encountered an issue for me, well not exactly an issue, but something that bothers me.
When building my team, I try to select only players who are Natural in the positions I use, and when I upload the "Players in Range" or "Squad Data" lists to the Calculator, I choose players this way as well. But sometimes, after I transfer a selected player from the list, the Team Builder tab in the Calculator shows that the player needs to play in a position where they are Accomplished, not Natural.
In my save managing Man City, for the past three seasons I’ve constantly had to buy players for the DMC position because the Team Builder says the player should play as DC or as DL (if they’re accomplished there), rather than in their Natural position. I'm guessing that Team Builder is trying to reach best average score for starting 11 with the list provided.
I’m wondering if it’s possible to add an option to limit the Team Builder tab to only the positions in which players are Natural?
I am not sure I understand your question.
Afaik, the positions in the position field are only Natural Positions.
The team-builder auto-picks the first result you would get for a given position in the data-analysis tab.
So if you add a Defender Right position from the dropdown, it would pick the first player that contains D R in their position.
If we added the Sec. Position to the views, we could also obtain the accomplished positions.
Like the player here, you may notice he is an AM (RL) Natural, but a M (R) Accomplished.
CBP87 said: I'm really confused by the new scores, what would you now say is a decent score? I know I can revert back to the previous score system and with that I would aim to get players who had a score of 360+ but I'm struggling to figure how the new scoring system works
I always load my own squad along with players I plan on buying, then pick players with a higher rating than the ones in my team, who are interested in playing for me.
I never thought of them as absolutes, but relative.
If you have the game editor, and want to know the absolute peak player score, I suppose you could load up someone with all 20s, and someone with all 1s to determine edge cases.
Possebrew said: I am not sure I understand your question.
Afaik, the positions in the position field are only Natural Positions.
The team-builder auto-picks the first result you would get for a given position in the data-analysis tab.
So if you add a Defender Right position from the dropdown, it would pick the first player that contains D R in their position.
If we added the Sec. Position to the views, we could also obtain the accomplished positions.
Like the player here, you may notice he is an AM (RL) Natural, but a M (R) Accomplished.
Thank you for your response. Let me try to explain my point in more detail.
Let’s say I’m looking for an AM (C) and I find a player with a score of 450. In the Data Analysis, his positions are listed as AM (RLC), ST (C). When I check in FM24, I see that he is Natural at AM (C), but only Accomplished at ST (C).
However, after I transfer him and upload my updated squad list to the Calculator, choose 4-2-3-1 formation in the tab Team Builder, it assigns him to the ST (C) position instead of AM (C), most likely because my existing ST (C) is weaker than my AM (C) in terms of score.
So, it ends up placing players in positions where they’re not Natural and I need to look another AM (C) after spending 140M EUR to an Accomplished ST (C). That’s why I’m wondering if there could be an option to make the Team Builder only assign players to positions where they are Natural, so the squad it produces matches the criteria I originally set when scouting and selecting players.
Esyuelo said: Thank you for your response. Let me try to explain my point in more detail.
Let’s say I’m looking for an AM (C) and I find a player with a score of 450. In the Data Analysis, his positions are listed as AM (RLC), ST (C). When I check in FM24, I see that he is Natural at AM (C), but only Accomplished at ST (C).
However, after I transfer him and upload my updated squad list to the Calculator, choose 4-2-3-1 formation in the tab Team Builder, it assigns him to the ST (C) position instead of AM (C), most likely because my existing ST (C) is weaker than my AM (C) in terms of score.
So, it ends up placing players in positions where they’re not Natural and I need to look another AM (C) after spending 140M EUR to an Accomplished ST (C). That’s why I’m wondering if there could be an option to make the Team Builder only assign players to positions where they are Natural, so the squad it produces matches the criteria I originally set when scouting and selecting players.
That sounds more like a problem in the Team Builder, than an issue with the Natural/Accomplished. I'll try to see if I can find the cause.
Afaik, the calculator is blind to Accomplished positions, it only ever considers Natural positions.
The Team Builder in its current form is more of a placeholder solution. As I mentioned earlier, I am surprised how many of you use it. I myself only used it two or three times.
Possebrew said: This is indeed how I also do it.
Although, I do not care about absolute scores that much, as I am still on my MAN save since I wrote the calculator.
My filter always includes Interested in Transfer & Loan, as it doesn't make sense for me to filter for players that don't want to play for my team.
Afterwards, I set Work-Rate to 10 as a pre-filter, and ACC/PAC to 15/15.
then I increment Acc/Pac until I reduced player-found to under 250.
My standard process goes like this:
1. I load my fresh squad-data, players-in-range & scouted data whenever I intend to begin scouting.
2. I go position by position for my squad and check if the best player in Data-Analysis is a player in my squad or if there's someone else ranking higher.
3. Based on the gap between players, I decide whether to buy/loan a new player.
4. Repeat for each individual position in my formation.
I am quite surprised how many of you request features for the team-builder, as I myself almost never use it. So I assume some of you already have more expertise in using the calculator than me
How comes you add work rate?
66connor66 said: How comes you add work rate?
I aim to keep each result set under 250 players found.
As work-rate under 12 has such a big impact according to another set of test results (which I can no longer find), I decided to filter the lazy bums out in-game already
It doesn't work for me since the update, when I load the html file it doesn't show anything at all (English).It was flawless before. Any suggestions?
Nebucco said: It doesn't work for me since the update, when I load the html file it doesn't show anything at all (English).It was flawless before. Any suggestions?
That's strange.
Can you DM me the HTML file you're trying to upload?
I sent pm
Am I the only one who gets players going down in CA like this using the trainning schedule from here?
https://imgur.com/uNVlZgk
Possebrew said: This is indeed how I also do it.
Although, I do not care about absolute scores that much, as I am still on my MAN save since I wrote the calculator.
My filter always includes Interested in Transfer & Loan, as it doesn't make sense for me to filter for players that don't want to play for my team.
Afterwards, I set Work-Rate to 10 as a pre-filter, and ACC/PAC to 15/15.
then I increment Acc/Pac until I reduced player-found to under 250.
My standard process goes like this:
1. I load my fresh squad-data, players-in-range & scouted data whenever I intend to begin scouting.
2. I go position by position for my squad and check if the best player in Data-Analysis is a player in my squad or if there's someone else ranking higher.
3. Based on the gap between players, I decide whether to buy/loan a new player.
4. Repeat for each individual position in my formation.
I am quite surprised how many of you request features for the team-builder, as I myself almost never use it. So I assume some of you already have more expertise in using the calculator than me
What's your attribute settings for GK?
cadoni said: What's your attribute settings for GK?
I filter for Reflex & Agility over 13 (Adjusting upwards if there's too many)
and with Aerial Reach over 12.
Usually that leads to about 3-5 Goalkeepers.