WaveZ ''3-1-6'' by Stan Seymour End Game Metal Tweak

This is obviously a tweak of stan seymour  3-1-6-0, Beautiful xG so I take little credit for the work but felt there was some improvements needed in defence and attack which I think should improve the overall rating on the tactic which I look forward to seeing tested. It may work out or may not but it definitely feels more robust in defence when playing

I've made many changes to the attack so both attacking midfielders are exploiting the space to get on to driect through balls driven by the midfielder and wingers who now create centrally. In my view AM is more overpowered than the second striker in my opinion

Changed the width to stretch the opposition. I changed one midfielder to roaming playmaker to create overloads in certain areas of the pitch to help the wingers get further forward to provide more crosses in for the AM's

I ran a quick test with Liverpool and all the goals were mostly and evenly scored between the two AM's that is mane and salah. Salah got 58 and mane scored 57 goals

In my own save I'm getting greater numbers with the two AM's and so many exploitative clear cut chances where the opposition can't do shit about the relentless attacks lol while the opposition are hardly getting a sniff at goal. In the original I found there were to many clear cut opportunities the opposition got, but I think this tweak has put an end to that and now it's just complete obliteration where the opposition have no say in the matter.

Thank you for the credit, mate. You know, our thinking was similar even before I did 3-1-6. By the way, I have a surprise for you, just wait until tomorrow, i guess i will put a new perspective on the clear cut opportunities thing. I can't play the game much because of my job, but i have something really weird things in my mind and I'm about to finish it.

Metal said: I've made many changes to the attack so both attacking midfielders are exploiting the space to get on to driect through balls driven by the midfielder and wingers who now create centrally. In my view AM is more overpowered than the second striker in my opinion Expand

Hi,

Could you write down all the changes you made?

Lapidus said: Hi,

Could you write down all the changes you made? Expand

It's a lot but I will do, just give me some time I just finished with testing after experimenting for a few days now. Let me enjoy the tactic right now because it;s ridiculously enjoyable


Stan Seymour said: Thank you for the credit, mate. You know, our thinking was similar even before I did 3-1-6. By the way, I have a surprise for you, just wait until tomorrow, i guess i will put a new perspective on the clear cut opportunities thing. I can't play the game much because of my job, but i have something really weird things in my mind and I'm about to finish it. Expand


No problem you did a wicked job in creating the tactic. I just felt myself biting my nails in some games where the oppo where getting a good amount of chances and shots on goal and we ended up needing to outscore them which is a credit to the tactic's attacking potency, but the backline where getting pierced to pieces sometimes

I just hope this has plugged in the gaps so we get the best out of your tactic. Anyway I look forward to seeing your changes

hahaha 6.3 and I'm getting better results than my other tactic I created which got 6.5

I never got these kind of scores against the big teams. Total obliteration

Metal said: hahaha 6.3 and I'm getting better results than my other tactic I created which got 6.5

I never got these kind of scores against the big teams. Total obliteration Expand

Why do you think this scores lower?

Metal said: hahaha 6.3 and I'm getting better results than my other tactic I created which got 6.5

I never got these kind of scores against the big teams. Total obliteration Expand
I told you long time ago Remember my first reply for your first thread. Test results can be deceiving. To me,  in this case, the important thing is what's happening on the field, and what's the experience of users having!

Stan Seymour said: I told you long time ago Remember my first reply for your first thread. Test results can be deceiving. To me,  in this case, the important thing is what's happening on the field, and what's the experience of users having! Expand

Yeah I know, I'm just interested why. Obviously the testing values something that your tactic doesnt satisfy and I'm just interested to know what that is

Middleweight165 said: Yeah I know, I'm just interested why. Obviously the testing values something that your tactic doesnt satisfy and I'm just interested to know what that is Expand


Metal said: hahaha 6.3 and I'm getting better results than my other tactic I created which got 6.5

I never got these kind of scores against the big teams. Total obliteration Expand
ZaZ told me that tactics above 6.0 points are seriously successful. Maybe this statement explains the situation better. By the way, if you asked me you use too many instructions and the role of the defensive midfielder doesn't suit me well, but when i be avaible I'll try this anyway, 'cause i want to see what you see.

@Metal This doesnt look like you've improved @Stan Seymour tactic. Your Utd team in the other thread performed better than Liverpool in this no?

Middleweight165 said: @Metal This doesnt look like you've improved @Stan Seymour tactic. Your Utd team in the other thread performed better than Liverpool in this no? Expand


They performed better because I was in my third season and made signings and was playing it

Liverpool no signings and standard test.

I think like Stan said too many instructions why it performed slightly worse, some changes are vital though because I definitely feel the defence is better and attack is more direct.

Will do another test later

@Metal  what are the modifications for the defense? Would want to tweak that but keep the attack as it is. Thanks

Metal said: They performed better because I was in my third season and made signings and was playing it

Liverpool no signings and standard test.

I think like Stan said too many instructions why it performed slightly worse, some changes are vital though because I definitely feel the defence is better and attack is more direct.

Will do another test later Expand

Thanks, thats clear

alex said: @Metal  what are the modifications for the defense? Would want to tweak that but keep the attack as it is. Thanks Expand

Sure alex I will post the changes soon when I get some time.

@Metal do you make a changes based on the quality of opposition you are playing?

Middleweight165 said: @Metal do you make a changes based on the quality of opposition you are playing? Expand

No

But I've made a new tweak WITH TWO ROAMING PLAYMAKER IN DEFENSIVE MIDFIELD

Added get stuck in

added tighter marking

removed dribble less

removed play through the middle

removed overlap


and ran a test with Liverpool and won the quadruple.

This should definitely get an improved rating so please test