|
Uploaded Date
|
Downloads
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
10 hours, 40 min ago
|
491
|
the current game versionPatch 26.1.3
Precision of Test : +/- 2 PTS | +/- 2 GF | +/- 2 GA
WIN 76%
LOSE 24%
OVERALL STATS
PTS
GD
GF
GA
PLD
86
+58
101
43
1,350
Matches
HOME STATS
PTS
GD
GF
GA
PLD
45
+32
51
19
675
Matches
AWAY STATS
PTS
GD
GF
GA
PLD
41
+26
50
24
675
Matches
Create an account or log in to leave a comment
3AM.
positive.
Positive mentality....

Congrats mate positive mentality is a surprise. Is there any player instructions for console players. Well done !
I play with a defensive or reserved attitude and have better results than in an attacking game.
Good results. Mark showed it was good, but no one had the time to test it yet in the shape of top tactics.
Not to bother you too much with PI... can they be taken from Closer v95?
Any player instructions ?
Let's wait a bit—I think a new top score will emerge soon. Reflecting on my own tests, I believe PI really isn't that important. The noticeable score differences in the ARENA tests can be attributed to several factors. First, the results from 1,350 matches still carry considerable randomness. Second, different duty combinations in tactics do have their own optimal PI setups, but these only become apparent in long-term holiday simulations—in actual matches, the difference is barely noticeable. Third, the AI teams' tactical choices during testing have a huge impact, which explains why many people's results contradict ARENA's—I'm one of them. Fourth, variations in player attribute settings across test files lead to different player templates, which significantly affect tactical performance.
As for using positive mentality, Feiwuxiaomei previously told me about it. He achieved a top score of 82 with strikers in a 3-4-2-1 formation. In my own tests, I found that positive mentality can indeed improve results in certain duty combinations. The PI settings for the 3 AMs in this tactic follow the most popular choices from the top-scoring submissions. Personally, I believe the 3 AM setup works better as is, especially without additional PIs. However, in the limited tests with positive mentality, the current PI settings do seem to perform better.
I think I should stick to my own convictions and tests when uploading tactics to ARENA, even if they don't always achieve high scores.
A Smile said: Let's wait a bit—I think a new top score will emerge soon. Reflecting on my own tests, I believe PI really isn't that important. The noticeable score differences in the ARENA tests can be attributed to several factors. First, the results from 1,350 matches still carry considerable randomness. Second, different duty combinations in tactics do have their own optimal PI setups, but these only become apparent in long-term holiday simulations—in actual matches, the difference is barely noticeable. Third, the AI teams' tactical choices during testing have a huge impact, which explains why many people's results contradict ARENA's—I'm one of them. Fourth, variations in player attribute settings across test files lead to different player templates, which significantly affect tactical performance.
As for using positive mentality, Feiwuxiaomei previously told me about it. He achieved a top score of 82 with strikers in a 3-4-2-1 formation. In my own tests, I found that positive mentality can indeed improve results in certain duty combinations. The PI settings for the 3 AMs in this tactic follow the most popular choices from the top-scoring submissions. Personally, I believe the 3 AM setup works better as is, especially without additional PIs. However, in the limited tests with positive mentality, the current PI settings do seem to perform better.
I think I should stick to my own convictions and tests when uploading tactics to ARENA, even if they don't always achieve high scores.
What pi’s did you
Use
TurboHips said: What pi’s did you
Use
IF:stay wider,cut inside with ball.
AMC:make more runs.
MC:move into channels,make more runs.
AWB:sit narrower,byline.
OCB:take more risks.