Interpretation of fm-arena testing result

by Bogeyman, Nov 18, 2021

Hi there,

Sometimes when I read some people's comments I get impression that they think if a tactic is on the top of the fm-arena testing league then it should get you on the top of any league with any team but that isn't how it works at all.

Here's my result with Tottenham using a tactic that has about 3.5 rating ( I don't want to reveal the tactic name ).

The team got 50 points and finished the 9th place.





And here's my result with Tottenham using a tactic that has about 5.5 rating ( I don't want to reveal the tactic name )

The team got 77 points and finished the 4th place.




As you can see I didn't win the league with a tactic from the top of the table but I did much better than with a 3.5 rating tactic.

I just want to say that the fm-arena tactics testing just compares tactics and it really doesn't say that with the top you should win titles for granted.

I really hope someone might find this explanation is useful.

3

I think you got the screenshots mixed up - but I agree. I think these testing league are for reference. If a 4-4-2 is the best tactic on FM arena, it's important to make sure your team is suitable for a 4-4-2 and I think that's what people miss.

0
Create an account or log in to leave a comment