OOP Position Rating = 1 ( Ineffectual ) PTS 72 | GD +30 | GF 75 | GA 45
CONCLUSION:
OOP Position Proficiency doesn't have any significant impact on the result.
It's much more beneficial to focus on the overall performance of OOP shape of your tactic and the attributes of your players rather then their proficiency in the OOP positions.
Also, it's important to notice that you don't have to train your player to play the OOP positions to see an increase of their proficiency in the OOP positions because their proficiency in the OOP positions should increase naturally just by playing matches.
Hi,
This test gives a good clue what impact the OOP position's proficiency has on the result.
The team shape below was used for the test:
OOP Position Rating = 20 ( Natural )
PTS 76 | GD +35 | GF 77 | GA 42
---------------------------------------------------------------------
OOP Position Rating = 15 ( Accomplished )
PTS 74 | GD +34 | GF 77 | GA 43
---------------------------------------------------------------------
OOP Position Rating = 13 ( Competent )
PTS 73 | GD +32 | GF 76 | GA 44
---------------------------------------------------------------------
OOP Position Rating = 1 ( Ineffectual )
PTS 72 | GD +30 | GF 75 | GA 45
CONCLUSION:
OOP Position Proficiency doesn't have any significant impact on the result.
It's much more beneficial to focus on the overall performance of OOP shape of your tactic and the attributes of your players rather then their proficiency in the OOP positions.
Also, it's important to notice that you don't have to train your player to play the OOP positions to see an increase of their proficiency in the OOP positions because their proficiency in the OOP positions should increase naturally just by playing matches.