I know it's hard to test all the options, but I have found in my experiments that 25% and 75% of some instructions are usually better than the middle or extremes. It happened in defensive line, and also in passing directness, even if it was very close that it might just be statistical noise. Anyway, I think it would be nice to test those middle grounds, but I understand if it's not possible.
ZaZ said: I know it's hard to test all the options, but I have found in my experiments that 25% and 75% of some instructions are usually better than the middle or extremes. It happened in defensive line, and also in passing directness, even if it was very close that it might just be statistical noise. Anyway, I think it would be nice to test those middle grounds, but I understand if it's not possible. Expand
You're right there's always a chance of 75% value is being better than 100% for some tactical instructions and if there's a strong sign that it might be the case then we'll also test 75% and 25% value.
For example, if we take the defensive line then its 0%, 50% and 100% values produce almost identical results so there's almost no chance of 25% and 75% values deliver anything different. Also, if we take the tempo then its 50% and 100% values produce almost identical result so there's almost no chance of 75% value delivers anything different.
Shouldn't be also a connection (maybe my logic is weak) between passing directness and the "passing into space" instruction?
Of course I'm not implying that testing this extra instruction is needed because it would add a huge number of combinations, I'm just curious what your thought about it is.
Base Tactic:
Team Instructions: None
Player Instructions: None
Each tactical instruction was tested for 2,880 matches and then the result was translated into a standard season of 38 matches:
Awesome stuff! Thank you!
Just signed up to write this. Incredible work.
I know it's hard to test all the options, but I have found in my experiments that 25% and 75% of some instructions are usually better than the middle or extremes. It happened in defensive line, and also in passing directness, even if it was very close that it might just be statistical noise. Anyway, I think it would be nice to test those middle grounds, but I understand if it's not possible.
Zippo said: Base Tactic:
Team Instructions: None
Player Instructions: None
Each tactical instruction was tested for 2,880 matches and then the result was translated into a standard season of 36 matches:
Is much shorter with hightest tempo cmming out? That's one touch football XD!
Gj for the amazing work!!! I'm loving it!
ZaZ said: I know it's hard to test all the options, but I have found in my experiments that 25% and 75% of some instructions are usually better than the middle or extremes. It happened in defensive line, and also in passing directness, even if it was very close that it might just be statistical noise. Anyway, I think it would be nice to test those middle grounds, but I understand if it's not possible.
You're right there's always a chance of 75% value is being better than 100% for some tactical instructions and if there's a strong sign that it might be the case then we'll also test 75% and 25% value.
For example, if we take the defensive line then its 0%, 50% and 100% values produce almost identical results so there's almost no chance of 25% and 75% values deliver anything different. Also, if we take the tempo then its 50% and 100% values produce almost identical result so there's almost no chance of 75% value delivers anything different.
crizeKOS said: Is much shorter with hightest tempo cmming out?
I've added the missing result.
At some point later we'll add a few more combinations.
Shouldn't be also a connection (maybe my logic is weak) between passing directness and the "passing into space" instruction?
Of course I'm not implying that testing this extra instruction is needed because it would add a huge number of combinations, I'm just curious what your thought about it is.
I've added 2 additional combinations to the 1st post.
It looks like the one above has the best result.
Zippo said: I've added 2 additional combinations to the 1st post.
It looks like the one above has the best result.
Thanks! Shorter passing and higher tempo works perfectly
I've also tried playing around with different tempo and passing settings and came to conclusion that shorter passing and higher tempo is the way to go
can u guys test the crossing pattern? most tactics have low crosses...
Please compare hard tackle and easy tackle, what is difference? Thanks
Would have some test with short passing - Standart tempo? Thanks guys