This is something that I was not expecting. All the top tier tatics in the table have Counter-Press on. lmao. This must have influence of ther other defensive variables, and probably width.
crizeKOS said: This is something that I was not expecting. All the top tier tatics in the table have Counter-Press on. lmao. This must have influence of ther other defensive variables, and probably width. Expand
There is no contradiction between the result of this test and the results of the tactic testing.
The result of this test actually shows that if you remove 'Counter-Press' then nothing changes or a micro improvement happens.
The difference between "ON" and "OF" is so small that it could be just a statistical noise.
Base Tactic:
Team Instructions: Counter-Press
Player Instructions: None
The tactical instruction was tested for 2,880 matches and then the result was translated into a standard season of 38 matches:
This is something that I was not expecting. All the top tier tatics in the table have Counter-Press on. lmao. This must have influence of ther other defensive variables, and probably width.
crizeKOS said: This is something that I was not expecting. All the top tier tatics in the table have Counter-Press on. lmao. This must have influence of ther other defensive variables, and probably width.
There is no contradiction between the result of this test and the results of the tactic testing.
The result of this test actually shows that if you remove 'Counter-Press' then nothing changes or a micro improvement happens.
The difference between "ON" and "OF" is so small that it could be just a statistical noise.
@Zippo can you test Regroup too?
Every time I see a new thread by Zippo I know it'll shatter one of the obvious beliefs we all hold