The 1st place is always spot on so we've decided to test tactics that reach the 1st place for 6,000 matches to be sure that the RNG is minimized to 1 point.

I do think that if you have made that decision then you also need to test any tactics that could get to number 1 through RNG. For instance, the top tactic could be as high as 59 through RNG but there are currently 8 tactics that could get to 60. I would have thought they should be also tested.

Mark said: I do think that if you have made that decision then you also need to test any tactics that could get to number 1 through RNG. For instance, the top tactic could be as high as 59 through RNG but there are currently 8 tactics that could get to 60. I would have thought they should be also tested. Expand

Yeah, I agree with that but unfortunately, it's is not a feasible task to do ( at least at this moment ) because it would required testing about 100+ tactics for 6,000 matches and that would took ages.

The 1st place is always spot on so wee need to be sure that the RNG is minimized.

If I understood well the request from @Mark, he means that some tactics underneath the first have the potential to reach 60+ rating with eliminating RNG. It will be nice if we test only those tactics at first which are 7-10 for now and then we can stick with a fix number for all the other tactics, including previous ones.

The top 2 have been tested for 5760 matches, did the scores improve from the original score? Reason I ask is because if they did and another tactic scores higher than what they did originally but currently sits third in the table then that tactic won't get tested over 5760 matches will it?

CBP87 said: The top 2 have been tested for 5760 matches, did the scores improve from the original score? Reason I ask is because if they did and another tactic scores higher than what they did originally but currently sits third in the table then that tactic won't get tested over 5760 matches will it? Expand

This is not sure. It may be go down as it eliminates RNG to 1 point away from the "true score".

CBP87 said: The top 2 have been tested for 5760 matches, did the scores improve from the original score? Reason I ask is because if they did and another tactic scores higher than what they did originally but currently sits third in the table then that tactic won't get tested over 5760 matches will it? Expand

Of course, after an addition testing the points can move both ways increasing or decreasing.

As I already said testing every tactic that have a potential to become the number 1 tactic for 6К matches isn't a feasible task at least for now because it would required testing about 100+ tactics for 6,000 matches and that would took ages.

At the moment we can afford testing 6K matches only the top tactic.

I'm sure you noticed we added RNG ranges around every score, it gives a clue about the potential of every tactic and it's the best what we can do at the moment.

Hi,

The 1st place is always spot on so we've decided to test tactics that reach the 1st place for 6,000 matches to be sure that the RNG is minimized to 1 point.

https://fm-arena.com/thread/2713-10-944-matches-tested-fm-rng-measured/

Cheers.

I do think that if you have made that decision then you also need to test any tactics that could get to number 1 through RNG. For instance, the top tactic could be as high as 59 through RNG but there are currently 8 tactics that could get to 60. I would have thought they should be also tested.

Mark said: I do think that if you have made that decision then you also need to test any tactics that could get to number 1 through RNG. For instance, the top tactic could be as high as 59 through RNG but there are currently 8 tactics that could get to 60. I would have thought they should be also tested.

Yeah, I agree with that but unfortunately, it's is not a feasible task to do ( at least at this moment ) because it would required testing about 100+ tactics for 6,000 matches and that would took ages.

The 1st place is always spot on so wee need to be sure that the RNG is minimized.

If I understood well the request from @Mark, he means that some tactics underneath the first have the potential to reach 60+ rating with eliminating RNG. It will be nice if we test only those tactics at first which are 7-10 for now and then we can stick with a fix number for all the other tactics, including previous ones.

The top 2 have been tested for 5760 matches, did the scores improve from the original score? Reason I ask is because if they did and another tactic scores higher than what they did originally but currently sits third in the table then that tactic won't get tested over 5760 matches will it?

CBP87 said: The top 2 have been tested for 5760 matches, did the scores improve from the original score? Reason I ask is because if they did and another tactic scores higher than what they did originally but currently sits third in the table then that tactic won't get tested over 5760 matches will it?

This is not sure. It may be go down as it eliminates RNG to 1 point away from the "true score".

CBP87 said: The top 2 have been tested for 5760 matches, did the scores improve from the original score? Reason I ask is because if they did and another tactic scores higher than what they did originally but currently sits third in the table then that tactic won't get tested over 5760 matches will it?

Of course, after an addition testing the points can move both ways increasing or decreasing.

As I already said testing every tactic that have a potential to become the number 1 tactic for 6К matches isn't a feasible task at least for now because it would required testing about 100+ tactics for 6,000 matches and that would took ages.

At the moment we can afford testing 6K matches only the top tactic.

I'm sure you noticed we added RNG ranges around every score, it gives a clue about the potential of every tactic and it's the best what we can do at the moment.