Deep Shadow underlap balanced

I'm changing up to a more systematic and methodical exploration of tactical changes. I really should have done this earlier, but oh well.

The other thread I uploaded for switching Deep Shadow to underlap was flawed in many ways, as was the local testing for it.

The current tactic is a true underlap, with
IF->IW
CWB->IWB
volante get forward (give space behind for the IWBs)
and switching it to balanced.

I also tried positive, but the results were unstable, though encouraging. I may still upload the positive version.

Testing was done with Bournemouth looking at only "for" and "against" goals, and ignoring xG. Holiday mode (as flawed as that is) with no freezes of players. I've at least got enough runs down to think that this might score higher.

Bournemouth
base: Deep Shadow (score:55)
For:74, Ag:53, 21
For:62, Ag:52, 10
For:69, Ag:60, 9
For:64, Ag:62, 2
=10.5±4

balanced CWB->WB (score:54)
For:74, Ag:60, 14
For:71, Ag:50, 21
For:71, Ag:60, 11
For:52, Ag:58, -6
=10±5.7

base+balanced:
=10.3±3.2

underlap (positive) CWB->IWB, IF->IW
For:80, Ag:53, 27
For:87, Ag:46, 41
For:52, Ag:66, -14
For:82, Ag:46, 36
For:70, Ag:42, 28
For67:, Ag:57, 10
=21.3±8.3

underlap CWB->IWB, IF->IW, balanced, volante get forward (give space behind for the IWBs)
For:79, Ag:47, 32
For:69, Ag:42, 27
For:75:, Ag:50, 25
For:72, Ag:60, 12
For:53, Ag:49, 4
For:76, Ag:34, 42
=23.7±5.6