Author
Uploaded Date
Downloads
Nov 15, 2023
109
latest patchPatch 24.4.0 (DB3.0)
not tested yet
Patch 24.1.0 (DB1.0)
WIN 55%
LOSE 45%
excellent
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
63
114
+18
78
60
1,200
Matches
Patch 24.1.0 (DB1.0) tests
click to hide
Test #1
Date: 16.11.2023
Test #2
Date: 16.11.2023
Test #3
Date: 16.11.2023

Try the combination of DM (hold position) +RGA, the overall structure does not change much compared to DLPS+DM, and see if RGA will have some surprises.

0

It seems that the potential of this formation has been fully developed, and the instructions for the attacking end and full back are close to the optimal solution. Only the midfield has room for adjustment.

In the test, I felt that the midfield task was more like an attacking initiator in the transition between attack and defense, and there were not many situations of forward penetration, preemptive shooting. Is this also why the winning rate of RGP and DLP is higher than that of VOL?

So I think maybe we can try to have the left center back serve as Libero to take on organizational responsibilities, while setting the midfield in front of him as VOL, while the other midfield on the right still serves as DLP. Do you think this would be a good idea?

2
Create an account or log in to leave a comment