Over SS balance

Changed mentality to "Balanced" to see how it works.

WOW

best 4231 in the house, haha

letsgo9 said: best 4231 in the house, haha Expand

Yes! Im working now on a 4231 with CM'S instead of DM'S but I don't think I can reach this score hahaha

Do you use oi?

Salmoura7 said: Do you use oi? Expand

Leave it to the assistant

Chris said: Leave it to the assistant Expand

Really? This changes the tactic just an FYI. Always remove it, if you are doing a holiday run

Another change no one noticed is that @Chris activate his Windows maybe this one have an impact on the score too!!

lol!

sponsorkindest said: Really? This changes the tactic just an FYI. Always remove it, if you are doing a holiday run Expand

wait, were you talking about Opposite instructions? If yes, I leave it to assistant when playing, when holiday test I touch nothing about Opposite instructions.

dzek said: Another change no one noticed is that @Chris activate his Windows maybe this one have an impact on the score too!! Expand

I bet that's the reason. =)

Chris said: I bet that's the reason. =) Expand

dzek said: Expand

Do you know why this tactic is in the hall of fame instead of 4231 Death Star? Both have same score but the other one has +1 at GD.

Chris said: Do you know why this tactic is in the hall of fame instead of 4231 Death Star? Both have same score but the other one has +1 at GD. Expand
Your tactic produced 1,586 PPG and the other 1,585.
So the difference is 0,08%

Did you just calculated it? Or I can just check it in this page? @dzek
Wow, the difference is awesome hahaha

Chris said: Did you just calculated it? Or I can just check it in this page? @dzek
Wow, the difference is awesome hahaha Expand
I calculated them on my own. Each run of a test the player-controlled teams play a total of 400 matches.

The formula is as follows:
(Team A points + Team B points + Team C points + Team D points + Team E points) / 400 = PPG
Then if you want to find the translated score ( the one that we all see on FM-Arena's table ) you just do PPG * 38.

FM-Arena's staff does the same to get the scores - then translates them into 38 matches which most leagues have so the scale of scores are 0 - 114 in the table. It's something I don't really agree with because there are leagues with fewer/more games per season and my suggestion was just to display the PPG, which is the average, or to translate the PPG to a scale of 0 - 100.

dzek said: It's something I don't really agree with because there are leagues with fewer/more games per season and my suggestion was just to display the PPG, which is the average, or to translate the PPG to a scale of 0 - 100. Expand

eh, all that really matters is that the normalization is consistent. whether we're chasing a 65/114 or a 57/100 isn't as important as the chase itself.

in other words, the real score are the tactics we made along the way

dzek said: I calculated them on my own. Each run of a test the player-controlled teams play a total of 400 matches.

The formula is as follows:
(Team A points + Team B points + Team C points + Team D points + Team E points) / 400 = PPG
Then if you want to find the translated score ( the one that we all see on FM-Arena's table ) you just do PPG * 38.

FM-Arena's staff does the same to get the scores - then translates them into 38 matches which most leagues have so the scale of scores are 0 - 114 in the table. It's something I don't really agree with because there are leagues with fewer/more games per season and my suggestion was just to display the PPG, which is the average, or to translate the PPG to a scale of 0 - 100. Expand

It seems incredible, didnt expect it was like that. I just though if a tactic has 60 rating it meant the tactic is supposed to win the 60% of the matches against equal teams. Thank you for explain that