4312 Master Zhou Zhou

Try using a combination of PFS+RGA.

Do you think PF(Su) is useful only in 2 striker shapes or also as a single striker?

Gianaa9 said: Do you think PF(Su) is useful only in 2 striker shapes or also as a single striker? Expand

I think the effect as a single striker should be better, of course, it is a supporting intelligence, can not be simply interchangeable with AF.

Hi, I thought this was already tested in the new db. What happened?

Arrow said: Hi, I thought this was already tested in the new db. What happened? Expand

https://fm-arena.com/find-comment/33390/

Chewbacca said: Expand

There is no laughing reaction but if there was then this post would certainly be getting a laughing one 😂

Omg, that's a great defence!

Player instructions for xbox please??

Dylan935 said: Player instructions for xbox please?? Expand

Hey guys, I wanted to ask if there are already people who have played with this tactic in the new database, as I unfortunately haven't achieved many good results myself, and I'm interested in how players perform with this tactic. Thanks a lot!

Soolgy said: Hey guys, I wanted to ask if there are already people who have played with this tactic in the new database, as I unfortunately haven't achieved many good results myself, and I'm interested in how players perform with this tactic. Thanks a lot! Expand

Hi,

I've tried it and had very good results but of course, you need fast strikers and you need to a good winger for the ML position, which isn't easy to find at all.

Not many teams by default have 2-3 fast strikers and a good winger for ML but you need it to do well.

Sandro said: Hi,

I've tried it and had very good results but of course, you need fast strikers and you need to a good winger for the ML position, which isn't easy to find at all.

Not many teams by default have 2-3 fast strikers and a good winger for ML but you need it to do well. Expand

Yeah, I noticed that my team wasn't executing the tactic as effectively as I'd hoped, which made things a bit challenging, haha. Plus, I ran into the issue of not having left-footed players in ML and AMR, as the tactic ideally requires. But with the right players, I can imagine this tactic working very well ^^

Soolgy said: Yeah, I noticed that my team wasn't executing the tactic as effectively as I'd hoped, which made things a bit challenging, haha. Plus, I ran into the issue of not having left-footed players in ML and AMR, as the tactic ideally requires. But with the right players, I can imagine this tactic working very well ^^ Expand

Look at this - https://fm-arena.com/thread/5345-attributes-vs-tactics/

If you increase some of the most important attributes just by 1-2 points then your result might skyrocket by 30+ points with any tactic.

A tactic by alone won't do anything, you need to "fil" it with good players.

Even the worst tactic with the best players will do better than the best tactic with the worst players.

Soolgy said: Yeah, I noticed that my team wasn't executing the tactic as effectively as I'd hoped, which made things a bit challenging, haha. Plus, I ran into the issue of not having left-footed players in ML and AMR, as the tactic ideally requires. But with the right players, I can imagine this tactic working very well ^^ Expand

You can always mirror the tactic so that the winger is on the right and the IF on the left, that's what I've had to do in my save because i didn't have left footed plyers

TTP said: You can always mirror the tactic so that the winger is on the right and the IF on the left, that's what I've had to do in my save because i didn't have left footed plyers Expand

What I'd like to know is how to do the mirror tactic conversion, could you please post the mirror tactic if possible?