Author
Uploaded Date
Downloads
Feb 12, 2024
373
latest patchPatch 24.4.0 (DB3.0)
not tested yet
Patch 24.2.0 (DB2.0)
WIN 56%
LOSE 44%
excellent
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
64
114
+17
66
49
4,000
Matches
Patch 24.2.0 (DB2.0) tests
click to hide
Test #1
Date: 12.02.2024
Test #2
Date: 12.02.2024
Test #3
Date: 12.02.2024
Test #4
Date: 12.02.2024
Test #5
Date: 12.02.2024
Test #6
Date: 12.02.2024
Test #7
Date: 12.02.2024
Test #8
Date: 12.02.2024
Test #9
Date: 12.02.2024
Test #10
Date: 12.02.2024

**THE TACTIC UPLOADED STATES KATANA 4231 104P V3.1.17 BUT DUE TO MY ERROR, I FORGOT TO UPDATE THE TACTIC NAME BEFORE UPLOADING. THE TACTIC (KATANA 4231 99P V3.1.17) SHOWN IN THE SCREENSHOTS IS EXACTLY THE SAME**

Tweaked version of https://fm-arena.com/thread/9025-katana-4231-104p-v3-1/

Changes-
Added Narrow width
Removed tackle harder from all roles
Added dribble more to AF







1

Uploaded wrong tactic i guess, but still great result!! ahah

0

Gianaa9 said: Uploaded wrong tactic i guess, but still great result!! ahah

Ah my bad! It's the correct tactic just named differently. Thought I changed it before uploading 🤦🏻

1

Gianaa9 said: Uploaded wrong tactic i guess, but still great result!! ahah

Is the tactic download 99p mate? I cant check as I'm not on my laptop

0

CBP87 said: Is the tactic download 99p mate? I cant check as I'm not on my laptop

nop it's the 104 pts

1

F

Gianaa9 said: nop it's the 104 pts

I must have forgotten to change the points before uploading the tactic, the changes should be on there though

0

Hello, well done once again for the score you made with this new tactic. Small remark, I have the impression that in terms of number of shots it is quite low? Is this also the case for you?

0

Ajax said: Hello, well done once again for the score you made with this new tactic. Small remark, I have the impression that in terms of number of shots it is quite low? Is this also the case for you?

Thank you, I've only tested the tactic with City and the amount of goals scored was pretty good in my opinion. 133 in the league is good going. What team are you? It could be down to quality of players

0

CBP87 said: Thank you, I've only tested the tactic with City and the amount of goals scored was pretty good in my opinion. 133 in the league is good going. What team are you? It could be down to quality of players

With Middelsbrough

0

Ajax said: With Middelsbrough

Could be down to player quality pal, it's scored the same as the other top 4231s so I don't think it lacks in the scoring department

0

Hi @Droid and @Zippo

I'm really sorry, @Gianaa9 is correct, I have uploaded the wrong tactic, the screenshots are correct apart from the tactic screen and the changes referenced are correct but the submitted tactic is wrong, Am I ok to upload the correct tactic on a new thread using the above screenshots bar the tactic one?

What would you like me to do with this one? Do you want me to run my own test on the 104p v3.1.17 and upload the screenshots for that one?

Thanks and apologies again

0

CBP87 said: What would you like me to do with this one? Do you want me to run my own test on the 104p v3.1.17 and upload the screenshots for that one?

Thanks and apologies again


Hi,

I really tried to figure out what happened here and what you say but it's too complicated so I failed. :D

I can say only one thing every thread must have correct screenshots and if there's something wrong just fix it and it's the end of the story.

GL.

1

Droid said: Hi,

I really tried to figure out what happened here and what you say but it's too complicated so I failed. :D

I can say only one thing every thread must have correct screenshots and if there's something wrong just fix it and it's the end of story.

GL.


Apologies, haha, I've uploaded the wrong tactic and the screenshots I've uploaded are for the 99p version. Ill update the screenshots for this one and create a new thread for the other one.

@Droid can you change the name of this tactic please from 99p to 97p

Thanks

0

@Droid I have updated the screenshots on the original post. Sorry for the confusion

0
Create an account or log in to leave a comment