Cherknam said: ok cool thanks, would you say pass + vision is more important for DM (you know being a ball player) or tackling + marking (more of a destroyer)? Expand
Nahh, dont get too hung up about those stats. Focus on quickness + endurance. FK taking is a nice to have bonus if you can get it (tailor your set piece tactic such that he'll always be taking it)
Cherknam said: Have you tested all the PIs for the IWs? I have this amazing one but can't seem to get him to average more than 6.8 unfortunately Expand
On personal games I tweak the PIs to suit the individual players as the season goes on; You can get plenty of insight from DataHub, watching the actual match play out, and (dare I say ?) giving the suggestions from your AssMan some thought
I do apologize if this is not the answer you're looking for, but its my honest opinion
Cherknam said: I must say, out of all the tactics I've used, none have been as good and consistent as this one, robbed of a 5,760 match test in my opinion. Thanks a lot for making it Expand
Thanks man ! Very much appreciated Nahhh, don't think of it that way... I'm just happy someone finds it useful
Cherknam said: Just one last question regarding the tactic, did you test all the different defensive lines and with two BPDs on defend duty? Just wondering as many of the other top tactics don't have a covering BPD and play with either 'standard' or 'lower' defensive lines. Expand
Not officially tested here, but in-game i tended to gravitate to a standard D-Line... could be a placebo but my defense seems to perform better ?
Cherknam said: Yeah I do too, but on this tactic it is a higher defensive line, so I assumed you tested with other defensive lines too but maybe I'm wrong? Expand
Cherknam said: ok cool thanks, would you say pass + vision is more important for DM (you know being a ball player) or tackling + marking (more of a destroyer)?
Nahh, dont get too hung up about those stats. Focus on quickness + endurance.
FK taking is a nice to have bonus if you can get it (tailor your set piece tactic such that he'll always be taking it)
Cherknam said: Would you say it's smart to switch from DM to DLP(de) when you have top players, to get the most out of the DM's technical abilities?
(obviously still with prioritising endurance and speed)
I think... we tested swapping DM to DLP it had minimal to no effect as long as the PI remains the same
Cherknam said: Have you tested all the PIs for the IWs? I have this amazing one but can't seem to get him to average more than 6.8 unfortunately
On personal games I tweak the PIs to suit the individual players as the season goes on; You can get plenty of insight from DataHub, watching the actual match play out, and (dare I say ?) giving the suggestions from your AssMan some thought
I do apologize if this is not the answer you're looking for, but its my honest opinion
Cherknam said: I must say, out of all the tactics I've used, none have been as good and consistent as this one, robbed of a 5,760 match test in my opinion. Thanks a lot for making it
Thanks man ! Very much appreciated
Nahhh, don't think of it that way... I'm just happy someone finds it useful
Cherknam said: Just one last question regarding the tactic, did you test all the different defensive lines and with two BPDs on defend duty? Just wondering as many of the other top tactics don't have a covering BPD and play with either 'standard' or 'lower' defensive lines.
Not officially tested here, but in-game i tended to gravitate to a standard D-Line... could be a placebo but my defense seems to perform better ?
Cherknam said: Yeah I do too, but on this tactic it is a higher defensive line, so I assumed you tested with other defensive lines too but maybe I'm wrong?
I just remembered I did sort of test the standardD line using the existing meta, performed all the same
https://fm-arena.com/find-comment/18201/