@ta2199 So which one do you prefer?

Blue or Phoenix?

and what version on phoenix do you use or which one gave you the best results?

thx

0

OpticFawn said: @ta2199 So which one do you prefer?

Blue or Phoenix?

and what version on phoenix do you use or which one gave you the best results?

thx


The top three tactics are equally good, that's why they are all grade 7.0. The difference between them might very well be statistical noise, since none of them was better in all three tests than the other two tactics. Maybe with a couple more tests, the order would even change.

0

OpticFawn said: @ta2199 So which one do you prefer?

Blue or Phoenix?

and what version on phoenix do you use or which one gave you the best results?

thx


I think if you want to score or watch more goals then use Zaz-Blue.Basically I think they are both good

1

I just uploaded Blue 2.0, on the first post.

0

ZaZ said: I just uploaded Blue 2.0, on the first post.

I suggested remove tackle hard in both AMC and instead add mark tigher

1

ta2199 said: I suggested remove tackle hard in both AMC and instead add mark tigher

Thank you for the suggestion. Too bad it's too small of a change to show much difference on my tests. They won't test it here either since it would be almost the same, so I will never know if it's better or not.

0

ZaZ said: Thank you for the suggestion. Too bad it's too small of a change to show much difference on my tests. They won't test it here either since it would be almost the same, so I will never know if it's better or not.
I know but I have " Red Cards Issue " with v2.0. I mean a lots of red cards

0

ta2199 said: I know but I have " Red Cards Issue " with v2.0. I mean a lots of red cards

Is it happening on the shadow strikers or other positions? With me, I usually get between one to two red cards a season, which isn't unexpected for any tactic.

1

ta2199 said: I know but I have " Red Cards Issue " with v2.0. I mean a lots of red cards

Set something like this for your code of conduct:


I use it for all my saves, harsh penalties for all the bookings, but players always accept it without complaining, and I never have problems with red cards with that setup.

2

ZaZ said: Is it happening on the shadow strikers or other positions? With me, I usually get between one to two red cards a season, which isn't unexpected for any tactic.

nevermind, It's just something weird happened during my Bayer04 save. I try again with Lazio and It lookin fine

1

ta2199 said: nevermind, It's just something weird happened during my Bayer04 save. I try again with Lazio and It lookin fine

Probably some players with bad hidden stats, like Dirtness, or just bad luck. Thank you for trying to help, anyway.

1

ZaZ said: Probably some players with bad hidden stats, like Dirtness, or just bad luck. Thank you for trying to help, anyway.

Have you ever try drag CM to AM(su) with "Shoot More Often" ?

0

ta2199 said: Have you ever try drag CM to AM(su) with "Shoot More Often" ?

Not really, but I would only put Shoot More Often if I had a good shooter. Did it work well for you?

0

ZaZ said: Not really, but I would only put Shoot More Often if I had a good shooter. Did it work well for you?

Nevermind, Not quite consistent

0

I did a final change to Blue 2.0, setting passing directness to neutral (I left the direct passing to Phoenix, since they are already too similar). with Blue 2.0 and Red 2.0, I will only try to make new tactics or improvements in the next patch. Please, test and tell me what you think.

1

Should have a retest for v2 @Zippo

1

ta2199 said: Should have a retest for v2 @Zippo

Try Red 2.0 later. It's looking really good.

1

quick test of Blue 2.0 - very impressive for the weaker teams, pretty similar in the test for CA165 to the original blue

2

Thank you @ta2199 and @healmuth for always helping with tests and input. You should get a badge in the site as honorable members.

1

healmuth said: quick test of Blue 2.0 - very impressive for the weaker teams, pretty similar in the test for CA165 to the original blue
Absolutely :D

3

@ta2199 can you share squad view screen please? And what skin do you use?

0

kireby said: @ta2199 can you share squad view screen please? And what skin do you use?
I use FM-NATION skin. I think if Barkley and Watkins didnt injured I could have won the EPL

2

ta2199 said: I use FM-NATION skin. I think if Barkley and Watkins didnt injured I could have won the EPL

Thanks so much, i will try it in my save and will share results

1

@ta2199 on which page is the skin

0

Well, my team is 8th predicted, many youngsters though. Two losses, each of those left me beyond a trophy. Dinamo won Juventus and Milan in UCL and made in UCL Semifinals so it's a big team in Russia i think.

Main strikers - both AMC

1

Pablito said: @ta2199 on which page is the skin
https://www.fmnation.net/skin21/67951622
Find something name FMNATION skin 21.7 on the top

0

ta2199 said: https://www.fmnation.net/skin21/67951622

is that the download link?  do not understand anything :D

0

I finished another season, and... it's a treble!
What a season Rodrigo Riquelme have spent, with rating of 7.46. He is one of the 3 best goalscorers with 20 goals and the best assistant with 16 assists (2nd place is my player too).
But we got smashed in UCL, but bookmakers odds were 10001.00, so we underdogs there.
And last word, look at my GK and we conceded only 29 goals in 34 games.

3

kireby said: I finished another season, and... it's a treble!
What a season Rodrigo Riquelme have spent, with rating of 7.46. He is one of the 3 best goalscorers with 20 goals and the best assistant with 16 assists (2nd place is my player too).
But we got smashed in UCL, but bookmakers odds were 10001.00, so we underdogs there.
And last word, look at my GK and we conceded only 29 goals in 34 games.


This tactic is very consistent, as you can see by the best Goal Difference in the table. Are you testing basic Blue or 2.0? I think 2.0 is even better, too bad it didn't get picked for tests here. In healmuth's test, it proved really strong for underdog teams.

0

ZaZ said: This tactic is very consistent, as you can see by the best Goal Difference in the table. Are you testing basic Blue or 2.0? I think 2.0 is even better, too bad it didn't get picked for tests here. In healmuth's test, it proved really strong for underdog teams.

Blue 2.0, buddy :) And yes, it's very consistent. Even if we don't win, we  have 1,3+ xG when opposition have below 1 xG. And in these cases i blame either weak defense/GK or attack. But i met this kind of cases only in few games like game vs Akhmat. Even vs Spartak we had 1.5 xG or smth like this when they had 0.8 xG

1
Create an account or log in to leave a comment