424 icebreaker CF Underlap

The attempt to balance and Underlap in the 424 icebreaker II, while checking the differences between WBA and FBA.

love the symmetrical tactics with asymmetrical roles, more please

I love this tactic bust still if i play at a low team example burnely and i play at chelsea away i don t touch the ball so what can i improvise so can work!?

what thw helllll mate ahahahah amazing work

Well well... amazing result. Curios to see how it holds

I'm confused. How can the minimum RNG score for the 3.0 test be higher than the maximum RNG score for the 2.0 test, if the match engine and the tactic are the same? Surely at least one of these RNG calculations is incorrect.

Cherknam said: I'm confused. How can the minimum RNG score for the 3.0 test be higher than the maximum RNG score for the 2.0 test, if the match engine and the tactic are the same? Surely at least one of these RNG calculations is incorrect. Expand

they changed some attributes in the database, it leads to differents tests and the "real score" of the tactic (the mean of the several tests) is different, so the confidence intervals could haven't intersection, like in this case

yesssssssss

Now, imagine what would be if you add 'Invite Crosses' TI to this tactic - https://fm-arena.com/thread/10046-fm24-invite-crosses-vs-none/

Lapidus said: Now, imagine what would be if you add 'Invite Crosses' TI to this tactic - https://fm-arena.com/thread/10046-fm24-invite-crosses-vs-none/ Expand

going to spend my today's uploads to explore that, just wondering if adding only invite crosses or also using PF instead of Cf e.e

Gianaa9 said: they changed some attributes in the database, it leads to differents tests and the "real score" of the tactic (the mean of the several tests) is different, so the confidence intervals could haven't intersection, like in this case Expand

Okay, thank you.

PI for console please

Cherknam said: I'm confused. How can the minimum RNG score for the 3.0 test be higher than the maximum RNG score for the 2.0 test, if the match engine and the tactic are the same? Surely at least one of these RNG calculations is incorrect. Expand

There are a) changes and b) never forget: There isn't a minimum RNG. It is always a confidence interval like "Minimum score with 90% confidence or 95% confidence etc." so you can get a higher or lower score outside the confidence interval.

Now add "invite crosses" to it

BulldozerJokic said: Now add "invite crosses" to it Expand

just uploaded it, let's see, pretty excited tbh ahah

BJ said: PI for console please Expand

Yes please

BJ said: PI for console please Expand

only "Tackle Harder" in every position，I think other than the key PI of "Get Further Forward" and "Move Into Channels", it's hard to say how much difference will be made.

BJ said: PI for console please Expand


Crixus95 said: Yes please Expand

The core of FM24's top tactics should be the DM-S+DM-S combination, which is more stable and has a higher limit than other defensive midfielders, which I have experienced especially in online games. This tactic is also the one I use most in online matches.

hmmm, are WB better than FBs now? Interesting

What should you do if you have a red card?

@A Smile What should you do if you have a red card?

Manidaro7 said: @A Smile What should you do if you have a red card? Expand

Since I only play PVP, I can only give you an answer from this aspect. If you're not good at making changes to the whole structure, take out a winger. Whatever the formation, taking out a winger has the least impact. If you want to go a step further, you can take the remaining winger back and make changes to the defensive midfield combination and the role selection of full-backs. With good adjustment, you may not even feel the impact.