|
Uploaded Date
|
Downloads
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Dec 1, 2025
|
210
|
latest patchPatch 26.3.0
not tested yet
Patch 26.2.0
Precision of Test : +/- 3.6 PTS | +/- 3.6 GF | +/- 3.6 GA
| OVERALL STATS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTS | GD | GF | GA | PLD |
|
68.5
|
+27 | 79 | 52 |
1,350
Matches
|
| HOME STATS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTS | GD | GF | GA | PLD |
|
37.0
|
+19 | 43 | 24 |
675
Matches
|
| AWAY STATS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTS | GD | GF | GA | PLD |
|
31.5
|
+8 | 36 | 28 |
675
Matches
|
| xG Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| xG Diff. | xG For | xG Against |
|
+23.7
|
73.7 | 50.0 |
Patch 26.1.2
Precision of Test : +/- 3.6 PTS | +/- 3.6 GF | +/- 3.6 GA
Patch 26.1.0
Precision of Test : +/- 3.6 PTS | +/- 3.6 GF | +/- 3.6 GA
Patch 26.1.2 tests
Patch 26.1.0 tests
Patch 26.0.6 tests
Create an account or log in to leave a comment
A 343 formation without FB/WBs. After thorough tests I found that WMF is the only viable role for LM/RM :|
Won FA Cup with Burnley.
I've been using a package of similar formation in Lower Leagues before I saw this; 3 different 3CB formations, but with WCBs on each side to act as ersatz WBs in attack and a different midfield structure. Def think there's more juice to squeeze out of a back-3. Great job, btw.
csj said: I've been using a package of similar formation in Lower Leagues before I saw this; 3 different 3CB formations, but with WCBs on each side to act as ersatz WBs in attack and a different midfield structure. Def think there's more juice to squeeze out of a back-3. Great job, btw.

Thanks! Glad you like it