Uploaded Date
|
Downloads
|
|
---|---|---|
Nov 2, 2020
|
387
|
latest patchPatch 20.4.4
Create an account or log in to leave a comment
Hi heres a new tactic I've been working up but I only tested it on my test everton save , I want to test and see if its worthwhile at all.
Hi I am testing the new tweak of my new System with improved (hopefully) setpieces namely corners. I will show some results soon with birmingham save
Hi lads please try my new ApeShyitt Sorted Setpieces version with fixed up throw in and corner system. NOTE: AMC take corners fullbacks take throw ins
Results have been good so far but I want to get the season through to make a conclusion...But kept 5 *edit:now 8* clean sheets in a row and never fail to score!
While the tactic tested higher than any tactic I uploaded so far and really good under favorite reputation , it suffers from the still-present effect of reputational adjustment of AI management that humbles its performance under the underdog reputation. Still , a half decent result.
I am testing now 2.0 system but the changes would be relatively subtle with small role tweak namely dlp:segundo volante and sk support:defend and a few more subtle changes hopefully they go a long way for the Better. Now is february in the save if results are consistent with 2.0 and i see improvement only then change..but so far first game sunjic 8.3 average rating as volante support with assist already .
Hello plz if possible can u test Apeshyitt version 2.
After observing version one I had came up with a seemingly improved (at least result wise but I think also play wise) version of the tactic with a bit revised roles and player instructions.
Final league table 114 pts and +100goaldifference started to develop version 2 since february.
Hmm first run looks promising hopefully second run even Better
Well looks like a somewhat of an imporvement over v1 at least.. (based on the 2 runs) , lets wait for third..Still thinking how increase with underdog reputation..
magicnut said: Well looks like a somewhat of an imporvement over v1 at least.. (based on the 2 runs) , lets wait for third..Still thinking how increase with underdog reputation..
Both teams have the same reputation, there's no difference between Team A and Team B
Well looks like a somewhat of an imporvement over v1 at least.. (based on the 2 runs) , lets wait for third..Still thinking how increase with underdog reputation..
Zippo said: Both teams have the same reputation, there's no difference between Team A and Team B
Isn't the difference between team A and B was suppose to be reputation or what is the difference in current test?
magicnut said: Isn't the difference between team A and B was suppose to be reputation or what is the difference in current test?
it was long time ago, as I said now there's no difference between Team A and Team B, having 2 teams just allows to test for more matches per one run.
Zippo said: it was long time ago, as I said now there's no difference between Team A and Team B, having 2 teams just allows to test for more matches per one run.
I see in that case is it just a coincidence that every single time my tactic scored a lot higher in team A?
magicnut said: I see in that case is it just a coincidence that every single time my tactic scored a lot higher in team A?
Yup, it's just a coincidence because there've been many tests when Team B did better than Team A or mix.