|
Uploaded Date
|
Downloads
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Dec 4, 2025
|
1,557
|
latest patchPatch 26.2.0
not tested yet
Patch 26.1.0
Precision of Test : +/- 3 PTS | +/- 3 GF | +/- 3 GA
WIN 68%
LOSE 32%
OVERALL STATS
PTS
GD
GF
GA
PLD
77
+38
82
44
1,350
Matches
HOME STATS
PTS
GD
GF
GA
PLD
41
+23
44
21
675
Matches
AWAY STATS
PTS
GD
GF
GA
PLD
36
+15
38
23
675
Matches
Patch 26.0.6
Precision of Test : +/- 3 PTS | +/- 3 GF | +/- 3 GA
WIN 69%
LOSE 31%
OVERALL STATS
PTS
GD
GF
GA
PLD
79
+41
84
43
1,350
Matches
HOME STATS
PTS
GD
GF
GA
PLD
41
+24
45
21
675
Matches
AWAY STATS
PTS
GD
GF
GA
PLD
38
+17
39
22
675
Matches
Patch 26.1.0 tests
Test #1
Date: 10.12.2025
Test #2
Date: 10.12.2025
Test #3
Date: 10.12.2025
Patch 26.0.6 tests
Create an account or log in to leave a comment
A traditional 4231 2DM based on my 4231 fwxm pikapong 2CM v1 tactic. Won FA Cup with Burnley.
Would you mind sharing the PIs?
MasterPain said: Would you mind sharing the PIs?
Tackle harder on all defensive roles and ST, stay wider on all WBs and IFs
What would you say is the main difference between the BBM and the 2 CMs?
I am using the previous version with the 2 CM and it is really good.
Curious to see if it is better and why to switch to the 2 BBM
moschonitro said: What would you say is the main difference between the BBM and the 2 CMs?
I am using the previous version with the 2 CM and it is really good.
Curious to see if it is better and why to switch to the 2 BBM
According to my own tests both tactics peformed similarly. The 2 BBM one seemed to have better defense against stronger teams; otherwise they were basically the same
Feiwuxiaomei said: According to my own tests both tactics peformed similarly. The 2 BBM one seemed to have better defense against stronger teams; otherwise they were basically the same
Any specific OI's?