3-5-2 Terminator XVI

Back to the old shape and tried the PI meta stuff

@Zippo @Droid these last tests were added in the attributes test list, instead of the regular tactics test list

https://fm-arena.com/table/26-attribute-testing/?mark=7544

take a look

Wow finally 53+ if it is correct, just needed to go back to old Terminator II and add few stuff ...

letsgo9 said: @Zippo @Droid these last tests were added in the attributes test list, instead of the regular tactics test list

https://fm-arena.com/table/26-attribute-testing/?mark=7544

take a look Expand

It's been fixed.

Thanks.

@Avenger22 congratulations for the result!
I really appreciate realistic tactics. Can you try all these tactical instructions again with a balanced mentality?

Stuaret said: @Avenger22 congratulations for the result!
I really appreciate realistic tactics. Can you try all these tactical instructions again with a balanced mentality? Expand

Thanks i am huge fan of this shape IRL also in FM for years, yeah that will be the final test for this shape in this patch, will try that but i think it will prob be 52-53 range maybe even lower, i tried with just adding focus play to flanks got -3 points so i think this is the max

Yes, I saw that test...maybe with 2 AF and 2 Mez(At) you are more dangerous using the center? And so you get worse results using "focus play to flanks"?

I expect that using this same tactic but with a balanced mentality, you will score the same points, but with 5 fewer goals conceded and 5 fewer goals scored. It would be useful to defend the result once you are ahead!

Stuaret said: Yes, I saw that test...maybe with 2 AF and 2 Mez(At) you are more dangerous using the center? And so you get worse results using "focus play to flanks"?

I expect that using this same tactic but with a balanced mentality, you will score the same points, but with 5 fewer goals conceded and 5 fewer goals scored. It would be useful to defend the result once you are ahead! Expand

Yeah will try that, i had 53 points in Terminator II which had 0 PI very few so i focused on other stuff here, and then i thought going back to that and add the PI and knew that 53+ was a possibility, also CM(a) and MEZZ(A) both in my tests are the same maybe 1 or 2 goals better the cm but points the same.

For focus play as i have seen here all flank heavy formation can benefit 4-2-3-1, 4-2-4, 4-3-3 and so on, for the 3-5-2 i prefer all 2 AF and 2 MEZZ to attack at same time and not one to go and help the WB so then i have 3 not 4 in the box for a low cross, when playing 95% of goals are WB crossing to the 4 players in the box, and combinatons between the 4 players is very basic stuff but not bad in the ME, there is a collision bug (MEZZ and AF attack same space at same time and look like they are about to headclash each other and it makes no sense positional wise) which has remained for years which i have reported in FM cause i have used 3-5-2 all my time in FM for years and it annoys me.

They have massacred my boy at least is above 50 ...