|
Uploaded Date
|
Downloads
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Dec 27, 2023
|
10
|
latest patchPatch 24.4.0
not tested yet
Patch 24.2.0 (v1.0)
Patch 24.2.0 (v1.0) tests
Test #1
Date: 28.12.2023
Test #2
Date: 28.12.2023
Test #3
Date: 28.12.2023
Create an account or log in to leave a comment
Tweaked version of this - https://fm-arena.com/thread/8404-wildfire-451-101p/
Changes -
Higher tempo changed to Standard tempo
@CBP87, no offense but what's the point in using "101p", "103p", "111p" in tactic names instead of "v1", "v2", "v3"
The "points" thing looks unlogical, ambiguous and unnecessary.
The "versions" thing look clean and nice.
I just really don't get it.
Nikko said: @CBP87, no offense but what's the point in using "101p", "103p", "111p" in tactic names instead of "v1", "v2", "v3"
The "points" thing looks unlogical, ambiguous and unnecessary.
The "versions" thing look clean and nice.
I just really don't get.
what's the difference?
CBP87 said: what's the difference?
"the versions names" consist less character and it's easy to memorize them and refer to. Also, they makes sense, by looking at the version numbers you can conclude which tactics were released earlier/later.
"the points names" complete makes no sense and I always wonder what's the point in putting them in tactic names.
Nikko said: "the versions names" consist less character and it's easy to memorize them and refer to. Also, they makes sense, by looking at the version numbers you can conclude which tactics were released earlier/later.
"the points names" complete makes no sense and I always wonder what's the point in putting them in tactic names.
Ok well that's your opinion mate, but I prefer to put the points in the name as it helps me identify the tactic, I think it provides a more unique identifier than v1 or v2
CBP87 said: Ok well that's your opinion mate, but I prefer to put the points in the name as it helps me identify the tactic, I think it provides a more unique identifier than v1 or v2
But what if two of your tactics/versions hit the same points in your tests? in this can you need to find some workout around.
Why not putting any information that helps identify the tactic in the description and keep the tactic name as clean as possible?
My mind is blowing when I see people come with name likes:
"433mybestevertactic 100pts LW IF KKTW ATTACK MANY GOALS"
For God sake... that's madness
Nikko said: But what if two of your tactics/versions hit the same points in your tests? in this can you need to find some workout around.
Why not putting any information that helps identify the tactic in the description and keep the tactic name as clean as possible?
My mind is blowing when I see people come with name likes:
"433mybestevertactic 100pts LW IF KKTW ATTACK MANY GOALS"
For God sake... that's madness
Like I said that's your opinion.
I do add a version number if the same points total is achieved. I'm not going to change how I name my tactics, you're the only person that seems to have an issue with it.
I've been posting tactics using this naming method for years and you're the first person to moan about it.
CBP87 said: Like I said that's your opinion.
I do add a version number if the same points total is achieved. I'm not going to change how I name my tactics, you're the only person that seems to have an issue with it.
I've been posting tactics using this naming method for years and you're the first person to moan about it.
That's ok, pal.
As I said, no offense. I just wanted to understand the logic behind that way of naming tactics.
Peace.
Nikko said: That's ok, pal.
As I said, no offense. I just wanted to understand the logic behind that way of naming tactics.
Peace.
Sorry, just read my replies back and I'm coming aross as a bit shitty. Wasn't my intention. I get what you're saying though and appreciate it can be confusing. It just helps me identify my tactics a little better and previously the v1 or v2 made identifying how the tactic performed a little tricky as I would have to go and do some digging where as putting the points tally in the name gives me a better indicition at a glance
CBP87 said: Sorry, just read my replies back and I'm coming aross as a bit shitty. Wasn't my intention. I get what you're saying though and appreciate it can be confusing. It just helps me identify my tactics a little better and previously the v1 or v2 made identifying how the tactic performed a little tricky as I would have to go and do some digging where as putting the points tally in the name gives me a better indicition at a glance
